Skip to content
All library documents

Forward Rates, Expected FX Spot Rates, and the Choice of Measure

Article Quant Q&A · Author: NSZ

Summary

The document asks whether a stochastic interest rate model for foreign exchange satisfies uncovered interest parity. Its answer distinguishes the forward exchange rate from the expected future spot rate, showing that equality depends on which probability measure defines the expectation. Under the domestic maturity forward measure, the expected spot at maturity equals the forward rate.

A change-of-measure argument derives the result from domestic risk-neutral pricing and the domestic zero-coupon bond numeraire. A second argument uses the foreign risk-neutral measure to recover covered interest parity: the forward is spot multiplied by the ratio of foreign to domestic bond prices. The response emphasizes that with stochastic rates, the expectation under the domestic risk-neutral measure generally differs from the forward. Thus, covered parity follows from no arbitrage, while an unqualified claim about expected spot requires specifying the measure. The derivation explains pricing relationships; it does not provide empirical evidence that real-world expectations obey uncovered parity.

Key ideas

  • The forward exchange rate is the expected future spot under the domestic maturity forward measure.
  • Covered interest parity links spot and forward rates through domestic and foreign discount bond prices.
  • With stochastic interest rates, the domestic risk-neutral expected spot generally differs from the forward rate.
  • An expected spot comparison is incomplete unless its probability measure is specified.

Tags

Full text
# FX Hull-White model


# FX Hull-White model












A model for FX, presented in Interest Rate Models, Brigo and Mercurio (2006), has the following dynamics: \begin{align} dr_t^d&= \lambda_d(\theta_d(t)-r_t^d)dt+\eta_d dW_t^d\\ dr_t^f&= [\lambda_d(\theta_d(t)-r_t^d)-\eta_f\rho_{S,f}\sigma]dt+\eta_f dW_t^f\\ \frac{dS_t}{S_t}& =(r_t^d-r_t^f)dt +\sigma dW_t^S \end{align} where $S_t$ is the spot exchange rate, the brownian motions are defined under the domestic measure and $\rho_{S,f}$ is the instantaneous correlation of $W_t^S$ and $W_t^f$.

The covered interest parity is given by the no arbitrage argument, hence the forward exchange rate is $F_t(T)=S_t\frac{P_t^f(t,T)}{P_t^d(t,T)}$ with $P_t(t,T)$ the prices of the ZCBs.

Is the uncovered interest parity also respected by the model?

$$E_t[S_T]=?F_t(T)$$

## Answer by Gordon (score 3, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/33703

Let $K$ be the forward exchange rate determined at time $t$ for maturity $T$. Then the payoff at time $T$ is given by $S_T-K$, which has zero value at time $t$. Let $Q$ and $Q^f$ be the respective domestic and foreign risk-neutral measures, and $E^Q$ and $E^{Q^f}$ be the corresponding expectation operators. Moreover, let $B^d_T = e^{\int_0^t r^d_sds}$ and $B^f_T = e^{\int_0^t r^f_sds}$ be the respective domestic and foreign money market account values at time $t$. Then, \begin{align*} B^d_tE^Q\left(\frac{S_T-K}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right) = 0. \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} K = \frac{B^d_tE^Q\left(\frac{S_T}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right)}{E^Q\left(\frac{B^d_t}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right)}= \frac{B^d_tE^Q\left(\frac{S_T}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right)}{P^d(t, T)}. \tag{1} \end{align*} Let $Q^T$ be the domestic $T$-forward measure and $E^{Q^T}$ be the corresponding expectation operator. Then \begin{align*} \frac{dQ}{dQ^T}\big|_{[t, T]} = \frac{B^d_T}{B^d_tP^d(t, T)}. \end{align*} From $(1)$, \begin{align*} K &= \frac{B^d_t E^Q\left(\frac{S_T}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right)}{P^d(t, T)}\\ &=E^{Q^T}(S_T \mid \mathcal{F}_t). \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} E^{Q^T}(S_T \mid \mathcal{F}_t) = F_t(T). \end{align*} On the other hand, we note that \begin{align*} \frac{dQ}{dQ^f}\big|_{[t, T]} = \frac{B^d_TB^f_t S_t}{B^f_T B^d_tS_T}. \end{align*} Then \begin{align*} E^Q\left(\frac{S_T}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right) &= E^{Q^f}\left(\frac{B^d_TB^f_t S_t}{B^f_T B^d_tS_T}\frac{S_T}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right)\\ &=\frac{S_t}{B^d_t}E^{Q^f}\left(\frac{B^f_t}{B^f_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right)\\ &=\frac{S_t}{B^d_t}P^f(t, T). \end{align*} Moreover, from $(1)$, \begin{align*} K &= \frac{B^d_t E^Q\left(\frac{S_T}{B^d_T} \mid \mathcal{F}_t\right)}{P^d(t, T)}\\ &=S_t \frac{P^f(t, T)}{P^d(t, T)}. \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} E^{Q^T}(S_T \mid \mathcal{F}_t) = F_t(T) = S_t \frac{P^f(t, T)}{P^d(t, T)}.\tag{2} \end{align*}

However, we note that, with stochastic interest rates, generally, \begin{align*} E^{Q}(S_T \mid \mathcal{F}_t) \ne F_t(T). \end{align*}

$$$$ As OP has already pointed out, Fromula $(2)$ can also be shown by no arbitrage argument. Specifically, at time $t$, while entering a forward contract with forward exchange rate $F_t(T)$, we borrow one unit domestic currency (which can be used to buy $\frac{1}{P^d(t, T)}$ units domestic zero-coupon bond with maturity $T$), convert into $\frac{1}{S_t}$ units foreign currency, and buy $\frac{1}{S_t P^f(t, T)}$ units foreign zero-coupon bond with maturity $T$. The net value of this trading strategy is zero.

At maturity $T$, in domestic currency, the above trading strategy has value $$F_t(T)\frac{1}{S_tP^f(t, T)}-\frac{1}{P^d(t, T)},$$ which should also have zero value. That is, \begin{align*} F_t(T) &=S_t \frac{P^f(t, T)}{P^d(t, T)}. \end{align*}

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.