FRA Arbitrage from Inconsistent Forward and Contract Rates
Summary
The document examines a bank’s arbitrage when the rate implied by borrowing and lending over different periods disagrees with the rate available through a forward rate agreement. It compares a six month deposit and a nine month borrowing rate with a six-to-nine-month FRA rate, then works through cash flows using continuous compounding. The proposed trade lends for the longer term, borrows for the shorter term, and uses an FRA to lock the rate on a later borrowing period.
The example illustrates how to align principal amounts and settlement dates when comparing those cash flows. The author revises the calculation to account for borrowing enough at the later date to repay the initial loan with interest, which changes the estimated residual gain. This is an illustrative discussion rather than a complete treatment: it assumes the bank can borrow or lend at the stated rates and does not discuss transaction costs, credit risk, FRA settlement conventions, or funding constraints.
Key ideas
- Compare the FRA rate with the forward rate implied by borrowing and lending across the same periods.
- A candidate arbitrage combines a longer-term deposit, a shorter-term loan, and an FRA for the intervening period.
- Cash flows must be matched by date and principal, including interest due on the initial loan.
- The worked example assumes the bank can transact at the stated rates without costs or funding constraints.
Tags
Full text
# How can an FRA create arbitrage opportunities? # How can an FRA create arbitrage opportunities? I'm working through Options, Futures and Other Derivatives (beginner trying to understand investment banking). I've more or less followed the discussion of interest rates, forward rates and forward rate agreements. However, I'm struggling to understand why the forward rate ends up where it is. I've read that one way to think about it is to do with arbitrage opportunities, and indeed one of the questions at the end of that chapter sets up the following question: > A bank can borrow or lend at LIBOR. Suppose that the six-month rate is 5% and the nine-month rate is 6%. The rate that can be locked in for the period between six months and nine months using an FRA is 7%. What arbitrage opportunities are open to the bank? All rates are continuously compounded I've figured out that the 9-month forward rate is 8%. But now I'm stuck. What actions could the bank take to arbitrage in this situation? EDIT: I know the answer is something like borrow money for 9 months at 6%, and lend it out for 6 months, and then invest it and buy an FRA at 7 or something, but I just can't figure out the steps. EDIT: @Student T - thanks for your answers. I'm trying to figure out the math to see how it would work Borrow let's say $100 for 9 months at 6% fixed: Cost to me is FV = PV * e^Rcn = 100*e^(0.06 *.75) = 104.60 ie I pay 4.60 Lend out $100 for 6 months at 5% fixed: 100*e^(0.05 * .5) = 102.53 Then invest that 102.53 at LIBOR floating rate, I think? If I have sold the FRA at the start too, for a fixed rate on 102.53, then at the end I stand to get 102.53*e^(0.07 * 0.25) = 104.34, so I gain 4.34 But if these figures are right, that means that I paid 4.60 borrowing costs and only made 4.34 on my investments. Did I go wrong somewhere? Or is the correct answer that there are no arbitrage opportunities for the bank? Would it have helped if I bought the FRA rather than sold it? ## Answer by user384842 (score -1) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/16329 Well, I think I have the answer to my own question. T0: I lend $100 for 9mo, I get the 6% rate, which makes me 100*e^(.06*.75) = 4.60 T0: I borrow $100 for 6 months at 5%, which costs me 100*e^(.05*.5) = (2.53) T0: I buy a 6mo/9mo FRA at 7% T6: Borrow $100 for 3 months at whatever the floating LIBOR rate is (I don't care what it is because I'm guaranteed to pay 7% on it because of my FRA). Interest I need to pay on the loan is 100*e^(0.07*.25) = (1.76) So I get \$4.60 from lending out $100, and I only have costs of 2.53+1.76 = 4.29 Therefore I make a guaranteed $0.31 whatever the market does. EDIT: I got it slightly wrong. You don't borrow $100 for 3 months, you borrow $102.53 to pay off the 6 month loan AND interest. Then you're left with $0.26
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.