Skip to content
All library documents

FX Forward Expectations Under Risk-Neutral Dynamics

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Jim

Summary

The document derives the value of a forward exchange rate at a future observation date and its expectation from today. Under the domestic risk-neutral measure, the exchange rate for foreign currency in domestic units has drift equal to the domestic interest rate minus the foreign interest rate. Applying Itô’s lemma gives the corresponding log exchange-rate dynamics, including the variance adjustment. Conditioning on information at the forward’s start date yields a forward rate equal to the current spot rate multiplied by the interest differential over the remaining term.

Taking the expectation of that future forward rate gives the forward rate from today to its maturity. The derivation uses the tower property of conditional expectation. It also corrects a specification issue in the question: a geometric Brownian motion written with drift in the exponent needs the negative half-variance term for its expectation to match the stated forward. The result assumes constant rates and volatility and the stated risk-neutral framework; it is not a general formula for arbitrary measures or changing market inputs.

Key ideas

  • Under the domestic risk-neutral measure, the FX spot drift is the domestic rate minus the foreign rate.
  • Itô’s lemma introduces a negative half-variance adjustment in the log exchange-rate drift.
  • A forward rate at a future start date depends on the spot rate at that date and the interest differential to maturity.
  • The expected value today of that future forward rate equals today’s forward rate for the same maturity.
  • The derivation relies on conditional expectation and the tower property, with constant model inputs assumed.

Tags

Full text
# "Expectation" of a FX Forward


# "Expectation" of a FX Forward












I have an FX process $X_t = X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f)t+ \sigma W_t)$. Now clearly $E[X_t] = F_{0,t}^X$. i.e. a forward contract of the process $X$ starting at time 0 and maturing at time $t$.

What if I want to look at a forward contract at a later date. i.e. $F_{a,b}^X$. Where $0 < a<b<t$. How would I be able to rewrite this in terms of current time? Surely it's not the value $F_{0,b}^X - F_{0,a}^X$. Put it another way, how do I determine $E[F_{a,b}^X]$

## Answer by Quantuple (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25825

[Question 1]

Let us define \begin{align} X_t &= X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)t + \sigma W_t) \\ &= X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f)t) \mathcal{E}(\sigma W_t) \end{align} then, in that case $$ E(X_t \vert \mathcal{F}_0) = X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f)t) = F^X(0,t) $$ only because $$ \mathcal{E}(\sigma W_t) $$ is a stochastic exponential (strictly positive martingale with mean 1).

Yet $E(X_t \vert \mathcal{F}_0) \ne F^X(0,t)$ for $ X_t = X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f)t + \sigma W_t) $ as you define it in your question.

[Question 2]

Under the domestic risk-neutral measure, the dynamics of the FOR/DOM (1 unit of foreign currency expressed in domestic currency) exchange rate $X_t$ should write (to preclude arbitrage opportunities) $$ \frac{dX_t}{X_t} = (r_d - r_f)dt + \sigma W_t $$ Applying Itô, to the function $f(t,X_t)=\ln(X_t)$ gives $$ d\ln(X_t) = (r_d - r_f - \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)dt + \sigma W_t $$ which one can easily integrate e.g. from $t_1$ to $t_2$ (assuming $0 < t_1 < t_2 < T$) to obtain $$ \ln(X_{t_2}) - \ln(X_{t_1}) = (r_d - r_f - \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)(t_2-t_1) + \sigma (W_{t_2}-W_{t_1}) $$ or equivalently $$ X_{t_2} = X_{t_1} \exp \left( (r_d - r_f - \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)(t_2-t_1) + \sigma (W_{t_2}-W_{t_1}) \right) $$

From the above the forward FOR/DOM exchange rate at $t_1$ with maturity $t_2$ computes as \begin{align} F^X(t_1,t_2) &= E\left[ X_{t_2} \vert \mathcal{F}_{t_1} \right] \\ &= X_{t_1} \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \end{align}

[Edit] \begin{align} E_0 \left[ F^X(t_1,t_2) \right] &= E_0 \left[ X_{t_1} \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \right] \\ &= E_0 \left[ X_{t_1} \right] \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \\ &= F(0,t_1) \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \\ &= X_0 \exp \left( (r_d - r_f) t_1 \right) \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \\ &= F(0,t_2) \end{align}

this is only normal since $$ E [ X_{t_2} \vert \mathcal{F}_0 ] = F(0,t_2) = E[ E[ X_{t_2} \vert \mathcal{F}_{t_1}] \vert \mathcal{F}_0] $$ by the tower integral property.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.