Skip to content
All library documents

FX Spot Delta, Delivery Dates, and Delta Hedging

Article Quant Q&A · Author: NewNY1990

Summary

The document clarifies how FX spot delta relates to option delta and settlement timing, using GBP/USD and USD/CHF examples. Its answer explains that spot itself has delta one by definition: its value changes one-for-one with the spot rate. FX option delta conventions can instead refer to spot or forward delta, and the conversion involves discounting forward delta using the relevant currency rate over the time from premium date to delivery. For many spot trades, premium and spot dates coincide, so that interval is zero and spot delta remains one.

The explanation separates option expiry from delivery and notes that settlement conventions vary, including currencies with different spot lags and deferred premiums. It cautions against using overnight and tomorrow-next swaps as though they were the spot transaction needed to hedge delta. The answer is conceptual and points to an external paper for detailed delta conventions and calculations; it does not work through a numerical hedge for either currency pair.

Key ideas

  • Spot has delta one when delta is defined as sensitivity to the spot rate itself.
  • FX option delta conventions may use spot delta or forward delta.
  • Converting forward delta to spot delta uses a discount factor over the premium-to-delivery interval.
  • Spot settlement lag varies, so time to expiry and time to delivery should be distinguished.
  • The response says ON and TN swaps are not the spot trade used to delta hedge.

Tags

Full text
# FX Spot Delta market standard calculation (Trader View)


# FX Spot Delta market standard calculation (Trader View)












I am just writing my thesis about FX instrument and hedging and one question popped up which I can't solve. Maybe it is silly but cant find anything about it how the delta of a fx spot is defined and I want to hedge it with an option in USD Deltas. The delta of an option is easy just the first derivative of the Garman-Kohlhagen option pricing formula.

I have a GBP/USD FX-SPot trade with T+2 settlement period and the deal is made today on the 8/13/2019. The spot date would be 8/15/2019 (physical exchange). I have the folling parameters:

$$\Delta_{USD_{T+2}} \approx Notional_{GBP} * pips $$

The question is how can I discount the delta to be the value of today.

How would I now discount the delta to today in terms of T+2 to T?

I would use the instantaneous fx spot rate: $$FX_{instantaneous_{GBP/USD}} = FX_{Spot}-(ON+TN)$$ but how can I use it in the approximation above?

If I would look into a USD/CHF FX-Spot trade the delta would look like:

$$\Delta_{USD_{T}} \approx Notional_{USD} * pips = \Delta_{CHF}/FX_{instantaneous_{USD/CHF}}$$

So my two questions:

- How can I discount the USD $$\Delta$$ for GBP/USD FX-Spot?

- Does the approximation makes sense for USD/CHF?

If not what approach should I use?

## Answer by AKdemy (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/63835

This will be too late for your thesis but you mix up a few concepts. If it does not help you anymore, it may help others.

Spot does not have delta (well it is delta one, as delta is defined as the change in value due to change in spot - hence, logically spot delta is 1, as you ask for change in spot for change in spot).

FX options are actually quoted in delta. Uwe Wystup and Dimitri Reswich explains this nicely. Many currencies switch from ATMS to AMTF after 1 year.

In terms of computing ATMD, ATMF, and ATMS; I simply refer to the aforementioned paper. Table 2 shows Spot vs forward delta.

What you refer to is the distinction between time to delivery vs time to expiry (I suppose). The later is usually from pricing date (when the structure is entered) to expiry (when spot fixing is observed). The former refers to the difference between delivery and premium date (what you say is `T+2`) but that is not generally applicable (there are `T+1` currencies, deferred premia etc.).

Ignoring all this, Spot delta is really just forward delta, $N(d1)$, discounted $exp^{-ccy1*\tau}*FwdDelta$. This discount factor is using time to delivery (premium date to delivery date). Usually, premium date is spot date (which is in turn `T+2` for many currencies).

Now that concludes the logical argument. Spot delivery is T+2. If option delta is premium date to delivery, you have `zero` time difference between premium and delivery in spot. Hence, why spot is delta 1 again.

ON and TN are not even forwards but swaps. It makes no sense to use these to (delta) hedge spot. You enter spot today, for delivery in `T+2`(in many cases).

Last but not least, delta hedging involves buying spot. If you would have to delta hedge spot again, it would defeat the purpose of hedging with spot in the first place.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.