Skip to content
All library documents

How Correlation Affects Basket Autocallable Values and Greeks

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user11798649

Summary

The discussion examines how changing correlation among underlyings can affect a basket autocallable’s value and sensitivities. For a linear basket, higher correlation is described as increasing basket volatility, which can raise the probability of an autocall and push value and delta upward. For a nonlinear basket based on the maximum of several assets, dependence also changes the forward level: less correlated components can increase the expected maximum, while stronger dependence can reduce it.

These mechanisms can point in opposite directions. Greater correlation may raise basket volatility and support option value, but lower the forward and reduce autocall likelihood. Stochastic volatility complicates the picture further: variation in volatility can reduce effective realized correlation, and the product’s short-volatility exposure can alter the direction of the effect. The answer stresses that general Greek behavior is hard to state without specifying the payoff, model, and bump-and-reprice conventions. Its numerical illustration is an intuition for the maximum payoff, not a general pricing result.

Key ideas

  • Correlation changes both basket volatility and, for nonlinear baskets, the forward level.
  • Higher correlation can increase volatility while reducing the expected maximum across assets.
  • The volatility and forward effects can push an autocallable’s value in opposing directions.
  • Stochastic volatility and correlations between variances can change which effect dominates.
  • Greek estimates depend on payoff details, model assumptions, and bump-and-reprice choices.

Tags

Full text
# Impact of correlation on greeks of a multi-underlying autocallable product


# Impact of correlation on greeks of a multi-underlying autocallable product












Please could someone explain how the greeks (especially the delta) of a multi-underlying autocallable product (i.e. an autocall on a basket) change when the correlation of the underlyings fluctuates?

Thanks

## Answer by Arshdeep (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/79661

Just think of the basket as a single thing. Correlation affects vol of this. So the effect is, correlation up, vol up, autocall probability higher, product more valuable. So delta is higher as vol goes up. This is for the linear basket.

About the forward, I am looking at the link of AKdemy. If basket is not linear, So the underlying is

$Max(X,Y,Z)$

which is obviously non linear so it's value depends on volatility. If X,Y,Z are determinitstic with $E(X)=E(Y)=E(Z)=0.5$ then the expectation is $0.5$. Now let's make $X$ and $Y$ I.I.D binomial. So the $E(max)$ is $0.875$. If $X$ and $Y$ are perfectly correlated then $E(max)$ is $0.75$. So correlation decreases the forward. This can also affect delta as the autocall probability is now lower.

Basically you want to put as many different things as possible in the $max$ to make it as much as possible. If those things are correlated (so put the same item again and again) it does not benefit.

If you are giving an exam and your instructor wants to award you the best of 100 attempts, would you want luck to play a part in your attempts - Would you want the attempts to be decorrelated?

## Answer by AKdemy (score 0)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/64190

The impact will be uncertain as stated here due to 2 opposite effects:

- Increasing correlation would increase the overall basket volatility, thus tends to push the option price higher

- Increasing correlation would decrease the Forward price, thus tends to push the option price lower

Now, point 1 is in itself not 100% clear if you price with stochastic vol models that exhibit a so decorrelation effect. Since SV has vols fluctuate as opposed to deterministic, you get more variation in the price of the underlyings. Hence, your effective realized correlation is smaller in SV. Even that is not the end of the story because Autocallables are short volatility, so when Vol is reduced the price goes up (all else equal). This effect is called bi-locality. The paper I linked demonstrates that for large vol-vol correlation, the bi-locality effect is the one that dominates. In the absence of correlation between the variances, decorrelation dominates.

In terms of what the greeks look like in general, that is in itself quite difficult to answer for various reasons. Greeks will be bump and reprice, with all the complications and implementation choices. Ignoring these, it still remains difficult to answer as there is a number of factors affecting this. You can find simple and intuitive charts here.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.