How Correlation Affects the Expected Product of Increasing Functions
Summary
The note asks whether the expected product of increasing functions of two correlated stochastic processes rises as their instantaneous correlation rises. The response sketches an Itô-calculus argument in a simplified setting: it assumes zero drift and unit, constant volatility, represents one Brownian motion using the other and an independent Brownian motion, and tracks the cross-variation term in the product.
Under those assumptions, the expected product contains a term proportional to correlation, with a sensitivity expressed as an integral of the product of the functions’ derivatives. This supports a positive relationship when both functions are differentiable and increasing. The argument is not a general proof for the original dynamics: it simplifies away the stated drifts and stochastic volatilities, and monotonicity alone does not guarantee differentiability. Applying the conclusion more broadly requires additional regularity and model assumptions.
Key ideas
- The covariance contribution to the expected product depends on correlation between the processes.
- In the simplified zero-drift, unit-volatility setup, Itô’s formula yields a correlation sensitivity involving both derivatives.
- The sensitivity is positive when the differentiable functions are increasing.
- The sketch does not establish the result for arbitrary drifts or stochastic volatilities.
Tags
Full text
# Lemma (maybe) to imply the sign of the sensitivity to correlation
# Lemma (maybe) to imply the sign of the sensitivity to correlation
Can anybody please help me to understaind if this result is true ?
Let $\pi=\mathbb{E}\left(f(X_{T})g(Y_{T})\right)$
where $f$ and $g$ are increasing functions.
Hence, $\pi$ is increasing with respect to $\rho^{X,Y}$ : the instantanous correlation between $X_{t}$, $Y_{t}$, defined by $$dW_{t}^{X}dW_{t}^{Y}=\rho^{X,Y}dt$$ and $X$,$Y$ have the following dynamics :
$$dX_{t}=\mu^{X}dt+\sigma_{t}^{X}dW_{t}^{X}$$
$$dY_{t}=\mu^{Y}dt+\sigma_{t}^{Y}dW_{t}^{Y}$$
and $W_{t}^{X}$,$W_{t}^{Y}$ are Brownian motions.
I would like to know whether $\pi$ is increasing w.r.t $\rho^{X,Y}$?
Thanks in advance.
## Answer by Kermittfrog (score 3)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/68834
I'd argue as follows.
Let's simplify and assume $\mu_i=0,\sigma_i=1$ and let us set
$$ \begin{align} dW_t^{X}&=dW_t^{(1)}\\ dW_t^{Y}&=\rho dW_t^{(1)}+\sqrt{1-\rho^2}dW_t^{(2)} \end{align} $$
Using Ito's lemma,
$$ dF(x,y)=F_xdx+F_ydy+\frac{1}{2}\left(F_{xx}dx^2+F_{yy}dy^2+2F_{xy}dxdy\right) $$
In our case:
$$ d\pi = \rho f_xg_y dt+\frac{1}{2}(gf_{xx}+fg_{yy})dt+\left(gf_x+\rho fg_y\right)dW_t^{(1)}+fg_y\sqrt{1-\rho^2}dW_t^{(2)} $$
i.e.
$$ \pi(X_t,Y_t)=\pi(X_0,Y_0)+\int\limits_0^t\rho f_xg_y +\frac{1}{2}(gf_{xx}+fg_{yy})ds+\int\limits_0^t gf_x+\rho fg_ydW_s^{(1)}+\int\limits_0^t fg_y\sqrt{1-\rho^2}dW_s^{(2)} $$
With corresponding expectation
$$ E(\pi(X_t,Y_t))=\pi(X_0,Y_0)+\int\limits_0^t\rho f_xg_y +\frac{1}{2}(gf_{xx}+fg_{yy})ds, $$
which is increasing in $\rho$:
$$ \frac{\partial E(\pi(X_t,Y_t))}{\partial \rho}=\int\limits_0^t f_xg_y ds $$
which is positive since $f,g$ are increasing functions.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.