Skip to content
All library documents

How Cross-Currency Basis Changes Covered Interest Rate Parity

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user6703592

Summary

The document derives an adjusted covered interest rate parity relationship by comparing two ways to hold value across currencies. In the basic setup, an investor converts currency at spot and invests at one interest rate, while the alternative invests in the other currency; equating terminal values gives the standard forward-rate relationship. The explanation then adds a cross-currency basis swap to account for the additional cash flows involved in hedging currency exposure.

A cash-flow example shows how the basis enters the return on the swapped currency position, producing a modified parity equation. The argument is conceptual rather than empirical: it does not quantify basis levels or establish when the adjustment is material. Its treatment also uses simplified rates and timing assumptions, so readers should distinguish the illustrative setup from the conventions and discounting used in actual swap valuation.

Key ideas

  • Covered interest rate parity equates terminal values from investing in either currency and hedging the exchange rate.
  • A cross-currency basis swap adds cash flows to the currency investment comparison.
  • In the example, the basis adjusts the effective interest rate on the swapped currency leg.
  • The resulting parity expression depends on the assumed cash-flow structure and simplified rate conventions.

Tags

Full text
# Cross currency swap basis with USD added on the covered interest rate parity (CIP)


# Cross currency swap basis with USD added on the covered interest rate parity (CIP)












We know the adjusted covered interest rate parity (CIP):

$$Forward = \dfrac{1+r\cdot\tau+b}{1+r^*\cdot\tau+b^*}Spot$$ Here $r/r^*$ is the risk-free foreign/domestic rate and $b/b^*$ is the cross currency basis between foreign/domestic Ccy and USD.

Can anyone explain why the cross currency basis is added and how to deduct above formula? Could you recommend some references?

## Answer by Attack68 (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/45681

The typical interest rate parity argument goes something like this:

Let $f_0$ be the EUR(domestic)USD(foreign) exchange rate. 1) You convert it to USD $f_0$ and invest at $r$ to receive USD $(1+r\tau)f_0$ at $T$. 2) You keep EUR 1 and you can invest in at $r^*$ to receive EUR $(1+r^*\tau)$ at $T$.

The two scenarios might be assumed to be equal at $T$ implying the parity equation: $$ f_T = \frac{1+r\tau}{1+r^*\tau}f_0\;.$$

However this does not account for market risk, nor holding assets in different currencies over the life. In the above you assume that market interest rates are statically attainable (on a forward rolling basis), and that the forward FX rate will not fluctuate and will be inline with the risk neutral price, when you need to convert your currency back in the future.

But say you receive on a EURUSD cross currency basis swap to $T$. You have just eliminated market risk, hold assets in the same currency (USD), but introduced an extra term into your parity equation.

Your scenarios typically look like this now:

1) You convert it to USD $f_0$ and invest at $r$ to receive USD $(1+r\tau)f_0$ at $T$. 2) You receive $b$ on a EURUSD XCS for T with the cashflows:

```
                 EUR       USD
[initially]      -1        +f_0         ---
[cash interest]            +f_0 r t       | (hold USD for T)
[swap interest]  (r*+b) t  -f_0 r t       |
[final notional] +1        -f_0         <--
```

Which results in a net position at $T$ of EUR $1+(r^*+b)\tau$

This time both these scenarios incorporate holding a USD asset for the life $T$, except one asserts a return in USD and the other in EUR. If these are to be equated you have the parity equation:

$$ f_T = \frac{1+r\tau}{1+(r^*+b)\tau}f_0$$

Read more about constructing Multi Currency Interest Rate curves and FX Forwards in Darbyshire: Pricing and Trading Interest Rate Derivatives.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.