How Diversification Reduces Portfolio Volatility Through Covariance
Summary
The document explains how combining assets can lower portfolio variance by spreading exposure across returns that are not perfectly correlated. It gives the two-asset variance relationship, in which portfolio risk depends on each asset’s variance, portfolio weights, and the correlation between asset returns. Perfectly correlated holdings provide little or no diversification benefit, while lower correlation can reduce combined risk.
For an equally weighted portfolio of many assets, the discussion separates average individual variance from average pairwise covariance. As the number of holdings grows, the contribution from asset-specific variance shrinks, while average covariance remains, so diversification can remove idiosyncratic risk but not shared risk. The material offers equations and examples rather than empirical portfolio results. Its broad claim that adding an equally weighted asset cannot increase standard deviation needs assumptions about the assets and weights; in general, adding a holding can increase risk, and the result depends on covariance and portfolio construction.
Key ideas
- Portfolio variance depends on asset weights, individual variances, and pairwise covariances.
- Lower correlation between holdings can reduce portfolio risk relative to concentrated exposure.
- In an equally weighted portfolio, the contribution of average individual variance declines as the number of assets grows.
- Common covariance remains in a large portfolio, so diversification does not eliminate systematic risk.
- Adding an asset does not guarantee lower volatility without conditions on its covariance and the portfolio weights.
Tags
Full text
# Relationship between diversification and standard deviation
# Relationship between diversification and standard deviation
Explain the relationship between diversification and standard deviation:
There are two general principles that should govern investment behaviors in a world of efficient markets, where one has the same information as other market participants have:
The first principle is the principle of diversification---of "not putting all one's eggs in one basket".
The second is the principle that one can obtain a higher returns over the very long run (though not necessarily in the short run) by investing in riskier assets. To put the second point differently, market participants require a higher return from an asset, and will correspondingly pay a lower price for the income stream from it, the greater the risk. This topic deals with the first of these principles.
## Answer by markowitz (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/44128
The material linked above by Emma are useful. However a short answer to your question can be the next: any equally weighted ptf, with $N$ assets, have his standard deviations ($\sigma_N$). Essentially diversification says that if we add another asset, always in equally weighted scheme, the new standard deviation become $\sigma_{N+1} <= \sigma_N$. Perfect correlation case apart the disequality is strict.
## Answer by jthg (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/44130
Here are two examples on how diversification reduces standard deviation.
Diversification in a 2-asset portfolio.
We have that the variance of a 2-asset portfolio is given by
$$ \sigma_p^2 = \omega_a^2 Var[r_a]+(1-\omega_a)^2 Var[r_b]+2\omega(1-\omega)Std[r_a]Std[r_b]\rho_{ab}$$
Where $\omega_a$ is the weight in asset $a$, $Var[r_a],Var[r_b]$ are the assets variances, $Std[r_a], Std[r_b]$ are the standard deviations of the assets, and $\rho_{ab}$ is the correlation between the them.
If the two assets were the same, e.g. the same stock, the correlation would be perfect, i.e. $\rho_{ab}=1$, and portfolio variance would just be
$$ \sigma_p^2 = \omega_a^2 Var[r_a]+(1-\omega_a)^2 Var[r_b]+2\omega(1-\omega)Std[r_a]Std[r_b]$$
The correlation between any assets is always between 1 and -1, so for any two assets
$$ \sigma_p^2 \leq \omega_a^2 Var[r_a]+(1-\omega_a)^2 Var[r_b]+2\omega(1-\omega)Std[r_a]Std[r_b]$$
Which means that the portfolio variance of two assets will always be less than or equal to the weighted variance-contribution from each individual asset.
Portfolio of equal weights.
For a portfolio of $N$ correlated and equally weighted assets ($ w_i = \frac{1}{N}$) we have that $$ \sigma_p^2 = \frac{1}{N^2} \sum\limits_{i=1}^N Var[r_i] + \frac{1}{N^2} \sum\limits_{i=1}^N \sum\limits_{j\neq i,\,j=1}^N Cov[r_i,r_j] $$
The average values these individual assets are
$$ \bar{Var} = \frac{1}{N} \sum\limits_{i=1}^N Var[r_i]$$ $$ \bar{Cov} = \frac{1}{N(N-1)} \sum\limits_{i=1}^N\sum\limits_{j\neq i,j=1}^N Cov[r_i,r_j]$$
From which it follows that $$ \sigma_p^2 = \frac{1}{N^2} N \bar{Var} + \frac{1}{N^2}N(N-1)\bar{Cov} = \underbrace{\frac{1}{N} \bar{Var}}_{\rightarrow 0}+\underbrace{(1-\frac{1}{N})\bar{Cov}}_{\rightarrow \bar{Cov}}$$
From that we can conclude that when the number of assets $N$ goes to infinity, the variance of the portfolio goes to $\bar{Cov}$. So basically, diversification is the elimination of asset-specific (idiosyncratic) standard deviation (risk) from investing in multiple assets.
All of above is based on Financial Markets and Investments by Claus Munk (2018, Chapter 4.3). I do not know if this is available online, but if not i can also recommend Investments by Bodie, Kane & Marcus (2014).Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.