How Hedging Liquidity and Demand Shape Stock Option Quotes
Summary
This discussion explains how option quotes on a less liquid stock can reflect both the difficulty of hedging in the underlying and the flow of customer orders. Market makers account for hedge liquidity in their bid–ask spreads and implied volatility, so options on a less liquid stock may have wider spreads and higher implied volatility than comparable options on a more liquid stock.
It also describes how repeated demand can affect quotes even when a market maker believes an option is fairly priced or expects the stock to fall. As the market maker accumulates exposure, they may widen the spread and raise implied volatility to make further trades less attractive and compensate for risk. The discussion is a qualitative explanation, not a pricing model or empirical study. It does not imply that market makers can supply unlimited options without price impact: quotes and available size can change as inventory and hedging constraints change.
Key ideas
- Market makers account for the liquidity of the underlying they use to hedge options.
- Less liquid hedges can lead to wider option bid–ask spreads and higher implied volatility.
- A market maker’s valuation can influence quotes, but customer demand also moves them.
- Repeated one-sided flow can prompt a market maker to widen quotes and reprice implied volatility as exposure grows.
Tags
Full text
# What are the mechanisms at play determining option pricing on stocks? # What are the mechanisms at play determining option pricing on stocks? Suppose a stock is currently at 100. If there are more willing buyers of a stock (retail investors, institutionals etc.) at $110 than sellers (also retail investors, institutionals etc.), you would expect the stock to gravitate towards the price at which there is a balance between the buyers and sellers of that stock. Furthermore, if the stock was a microcap, and have few shares outstanding, and low volume on any given day, large institutionals have a limited way of participating in the upside of the stock (i.e. at most they can buy the entire company). Now consider an American style option on public company like (AAPL or GME). If I buy a call option on GME, based on my understanding, in most cases, it is a market maker on the other side of the trade, selling me the call, and hedging appropriately with GME shares. - Does this mean that the options market's depth, even on a small company like GME is much greater than the underlying? In other words, does this mean that market makers will continue to buy or write options to the market's satisfaction without constraint (and without pushing up the price) like there is in the case of equities, where you are limited by the number of shares outstanding? - And if 1 is correct, does this mean that the market maker's view on the options "correct" pricing is what drives the option's pricing? For example, if an options market was extremely illiquid, and there were really only 2 players, Party A who is bullish on the price of the option, and Party B who is bearish. If Party A is willing to bet more on his view, then does the price of the option rise? Or is this largely negated by the market maker, in the sense that even if Party A's bets dwarfs Party B, there will always be the market maker who keeps the options price close to what the market maker thinks it should be priced at. If there are any resources that one can point to to help me understand the mechanics / plumbing of how "price discovery" works for options, that would be great. ## Answer by Jan Stuller (score 1) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/60986 When you market-make anything, you definitely take liquidity into account via the bid-offer spread (and via Implied Vol when you quote options). So if the underlying that you need to hedge with is not liquid like GME, the bid-off spread on the option will be larger than on options that have liquid underlying. Also the premium of the option (expressed as Implied Volatility) would be much higher on GME options than on blue chip stocks (think of this premium as a % of the price of the underlying; if you took a blue-chip stock with the same price as GME, and considered two options with the same maturity and strike, the mid price of the option on GME would be much higher. In addition, the bid-offer spread on the GME option would be wider). As far as 2) is concerned, the market maker's view is definitively a driver in the option price. If all market makers started believing that GME stock will go down, they would be happy to sell calls at near mid prices (of the bid-offer spread). But the demand is a bigger driver: if the market-maker gets asked to sell 1000 calls when the GME price is (say) 400 and he believes the price of GME should go down, he'll quote option price near mid. If he keeps being asked and the market comes to him another 10 times with the same demand, he'll not want to keep increasing his risk exposure and will start quoting higher bid-offer spread as well as higher implied vol of the call option, driving the option price up.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.