Skip to content
All library documents

How Non-Deliverable Interest Rate Swaps Settle and Carry FX Risk

Article Quant Q&A · Author: mark resen

Summary

A non-deliverable interest rate swap exchanges fixed and floating interest cash flows linked to one local currency, but settles the net amount in a deliverable currency such as USD or EUR. The example describes paying a fixed local-currency rate and receiving a local floating index; the difference is converted using an exchange rate specified in the contract, including the rate source and observation date. This explains how local interest-rate exposure can be taken or hedged without physically transferring the local currency.

Collateral depends on the parties’ margin agreement, so the document does not establish a universal currency requirement. It distinguishes an interest rate swap from a cross-currency swap, which exchanges interest legs in different currencies and typically notionals. Compared with a local bond, a swap has no principal repayment and is generally initiated near zero market value; a bond exposes its holder to currency movements on coupons and principal. The discussion is conceptual and does not provide pricing formulas or a detailed numerical valuation. It also notes that fixing the conversion rate for a non-deliverable payment ends FX exposure on that cash flow.

Key ideas

  • An NDIRS references local-currency fixed and floating rates but settles net cash flows in another currency.
  • The contract specifies the exchange-rate source and observation timing used to convert each payment.
  • Collateral currency is determined by the margin agreement rather than by a universal NDIRS convention.
  • A cross-currency swap differs by having legs in different currencies and exchanges notionals.
  • After the conversion rate for a non-deliverable cash flow is fixed, that payment no longer carries local FX risk.

Tags

Full text
# Non deliverable interest rate swaps (NIRS)


# Non deliverable interest rate swaps (NIRS)












Can you pls explain how the payoff of an NIRS is calculated and what collateral is usually posted (USD or local ccy)? I am especially interested on how the FX risk is incorporated in the pay off and how it differs from a local ccy bond?

## Answer by Dimitri Vulis (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/79850

In an IRS, there are two legs denominated in the same currency. Typically one leg is fixed, and the other is floating - getting reset from some index not known at the time of the trade, but observable later, when the payments are set.

Suppose for concreteness/simplicity that you're paying fixed 15% RUB and you're receiving Moscow PRIME index, annual frequency. Or IRR or some other sanctioned/terrorist currency.

If this were physical delivery, then for each coupon, you pay 15% of the notional, and you receive MOSPRIME $\times$ the notional. Netting, if MOSPRIME>15%, then you receive net MOSPRIME-15%, and conversely if MOSPRIME<15%, then instead you pay net 15%-MOSPRIME.

The goal of an IRS is always to change one's sensitivity to interest rates. You hope (with this swap) that MOSPRIME will go up, and your counterparty hopes that MOSPRIME will go down. Perhaps you're speculating, or perhaps you're trying to hedge away an unwanted interest rate sensitivity arising from your other activities, e.g. owning a local bond.

Because this swap is ND, you settle in some other currency, like EUR or USD or CNY/CNH, which can be physically delivered. Your term sheet must say very specifically when and how you will observe the exchange rate of the denomination currency to the settlement currency. It is similar to how the term sheet specifies where the reset index for the floating leg is observed. Typically, the official currency exchange rate is published by a central bank and uses a 2 business day lag. You multiply the local currency amount by the observed exchange rate to get the amount that you will pay or receive in the settlement currency.

The collateral is whatever your margin agreements say. Since people trade ND when physically delivering the currency is too difficult, I doubt that it would require collateral in the currency of the swap. Probably the settlement currency is one of the choices.

The IRS differs from a cross-currency swap (CCS) - there is no exchange of notionals. In a CCS, the two legs are denominated in different currencies and so both legs may be fixed - the future exchange rate is uncertain.

Swaps differ from cash local currency bond in many ways: you usually need an ISDA agreement to trade swps, a swap's mark to market is near 0 at inception, and the bond pays principal/notional at maturity, so has much more currency rate risk. In theory, the IRS is similar to two local currency bonds - one fixed, one floating and one long, one short, with exactly the same coupon schedules an offsetting principal repayments. But you can't achieve this practically.

Note that you can often find someone to sell you a total return swap (TRS) or global depositary note (GDN) on a local currency bond: the counterparty owns the bond, receives physical local currency for coupons and principal, pays you the equivalent amount of hard currency.

Edit note also that the non-delivery-ness doesn't change pricing, but affects the risk in a subtle way. If you have a physically delivered cash flow in the local currency, then tou have both the counterparty credit risk and the currency exchange rate risk until the cash flow occurs. But if the cash flow is ND, then once the exchange rate for this cash flow is observed and "frozen", there is no more local currency exchange rate risk. If the interest rate risk were material, then that too would be affected.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.