Skip to content
All library documents

How Option Settlement Through Futures Affects Delivery Fees

Article Deribit Insights

Summary

The document explains a change in which in-the-money options first settle into futures contracts, and those futures then settle in cash. It applies initially to linear USDC-settled options, with inverse coin-settled options planned later. The settlement currency, expiry reference price, and total option profit or loss remain the same. Transaction logs gain an entry showing the option’s conversion into a future before the future’s cash delivery.

The main practical effect is how delivery fees are calculated when traders already hold positions in the expiring future. The option’s delivery fee still applies, but the resulting futures position can offset an existing futures position before that future’s fee is assessed. The examples show that this can reduce fees when positions net or reverse, while fees remain unchanged when there is no offset. The explanation concerns this exchange’s process and fee mechanics; it does not describe a change in option valuation or establish that traders will always pay less.

Key ideas

  • In-the-money options are converted into futures before the futures settle in cash.
  • The settlement currency, expiry pricing reference, and total profit or loss remain unchanged.
  • The option delivery fee still applies, while an offsetting futures position can reduce the future’s delivery fee.
  • Out-of-the-money options have no futures position to deliver and retain a single expiry log entry.
  • The fee outcome depends on whether the generated futures position offsets an existing position.

Tags

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.