Skip to content
All library documents

How Rates and Dividends Shape Futures Maturity Sensitivity

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Qwerty

Summary

The document examines whether a longer-dated futures contract on the same underlying should be more expensive than a shorter-dated one. It first gives the forward price under deterministic interest rates and continuous dividends: spot value is multiplied by the accumulated net cost of carry through expiry. Differentiating with respect to maturity shows that the maturity sensitivity is the forward price times the expiry-date interest rate less the dividend yield.

Under these assumptions, a positive rate component raises the forward price with maturity, while a positive dividend yield lowers it. The response applies the same result approximately to futures because futures and forwards have matching prices when rates and dividends are deterministic and counterparty credit risk is absent. This is not a universal ranking rule: stochastic interest rates can make futures and forwards differ, with the relationship affected by correlation terms. The underlying must also be freely tradable for the stated pricing setup to apply; the response flags indices and volatility products as possible exceptions.

Key ideas

  • With deterministic rates and dividends, forward value reflects spot compounded by net cost of carry.
  • The maturity sensitivity equals forward value multiplied by the interest rate minus dividend yield at expiry.
  • Positive rates tend to increase forward value with maturity, while dividends tend to reduce it.
  • Futures and forwards coincide under deterministic rates and dividends when counterparty credit risk is absent.
  • Stochastic rates can introduce model-dependent differences, including effects from correlations.

Tags

Full text
# Greeks for Futures


# Greeks for Futures












Is there some general result on the sensitivity of futures price to its maturity? For example, I have two futures on the same underlying, but maturing at different dates. Can I say which one is more expensive? Or it depends on the model/parameters?

## Answer by StackG (score 5, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/59168

This is a slightly deeper question that it appears at first. Depending on your treatment of rates (deterministic vs. stochastic), it can indeed be model-dependent.

Let's first think about a forward contract $F_T(t)$ locks you in to a transaction at price $F_T(t)$ on an underlying $S(t)$ at time $T$. The well-known price of this contract at time $t$ is

\begin{align} F_T(t) = S(t) \cdot e^{\int^T_t ( r(s) - q(s) ) ds} \end{align}

where I've assumed that the underlying $S$ is freely tradable (note this sometimes doesn't strictly hold for indices, VIX, etc.), and that the underlying pays continuous dividends at rate $q$, and that both $r(t)$ and $q(t)$ are deterministic (otherwise we need some expectation terms to appear).

We can differentiate this contract by $T$ to calculate the effect on its price of a longer time-to-expiry:

\begin{align} {\frac {\partial} {\partial T}} F_T(t) &= {\frac {\partial} {\partial T}} S(t) \cdot e^{\int^T_t ( r(s) - q(s) ) ds} \\ &= S(t) \cdot e^{\int^T_t ( r(s) - q(s) ) ds} \cdot {\frac {\partial} {\partial T}} \int^T_t ( r(s) - q(s) ) ds \\ &= S(t) \cdot e^{\int^T_t ( r(s) - q(s) ) ds} \cdot \bigl( r(T) - q(T) \bigr) \\ &= F_T(t) \cdot \bigl( r(T) - q(T) \bigr) \end{align}

So this, as expected, says that $F_T(t)$ will increase with $T$ if rates are positive (as by trading the future we are 'avoiding' funding costs, and need to pay for that), but will decrease with $T$ if dividends are positive (as we're missing out on dividends by not holding the underlying, and need compensation for that).

How do forwards and futures relate? Well, it turns out that they are the same when both:

- rates and dividends are deterministic

- there is no counterparty credit risk

So as a first approximation, you can use this expression for your futures $T$-greek. If you want to extend this to stochastic rates things become a little more tricky due to correlation terms, see for example here and here.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.