How Regulation Is Shifting Pricing Quant Roles
Summary
The post considers whether pricing quant work will remain viable as regulation tightens, exotic products decline, and some bank teams shrink. The answer argues that pricing and hedging expertise will still be needed because financial firms continue to structure and trade nonlinear products. It suggests that demand may shift toward standard products, larger flow desks, collateral and credit valuation work, and broader risk calculations.
The response describes an organizational shift: firms may rely more on software vendors, while sophisticated projects move from front-office groups into risk and technology teams. It outlines differing skills for those paths, including careful delivery against detailed specifications at vendors, robust modeling and broad risk understanding in risk teams, and data handling and distribution in technology. These are qualitative observations and career guidance, not measured labor-market evidence or a forecast with quantified outcomes. The discussion reflects the conditions described in the post and may not capture later changes in regulation or hiring.
Key ideas
- Pricing and hedging work can persist as firms continue to structure and consume nonlinear products.
- Regulation can increase the need to value products with collateral and credit adjustments and to calculate risk across more positions.
- Some quantitative work may shift from bank front offices toward vendors, risk teams, and technology groups.
- Pricing quants may benefit from skills in robust modeling, software delivery, project coordination, and data systems.
- The post offers qualitative career guidance rather than evidence from hiring data.
Tags
Full text
# Does pricing quant still have bright future? # Does pricing quant still have bright future? With regulators tightening the tether, tradings are shrinking and exotic products are fading out, or as my quant friends told me so. By the lag of education to the market, more MFE graduates are entering the market but the desk quants and library quants positions are downsizing. Also the Basel is pushing for standard approaches for CVA and Daniel K Tarullo from FED even suggests replace in-house VaR calculation. So is there still future for pricing quants? Is it a bad time to consider entering this area? ## Answer by lehalle (score 8, accepted) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/12785 Of course banks will continue to structure non linear products, other participants to consume them. Thus pricing and hedging them will be needed. On the one hand less exotic products and more "standard" ones are needed, giving birth to larger flow desks and business. But on the other hands regulation change the way to valuate them (think about CVA and collateralization in general), modifying the payoffs and demanding to store more details about the products. Regulators and policy makers demand to do all that faster, and to compute risks on more products (clearing more nonlinear products). As an industry, the financial firms reacts by: - using software vendors more than in house tools; thus quants doing this kind of tasks will be more in software vendors than banks and funds, - moving the sophisticated projects from front teams to risk and IT dept (in the latter case in "big data" groups inside IT dept). if you join a vendor, you will be needed to be very rigorous and to be able to comply with sophisticated functional specs (and invest time in project management knowledge), you will have access to management roles (more people to synchronize), and potentially have to do client facing. If you are in risk dept, you will be ask to have a boarder view that just implementing Euler scheme, and to use robust models rather than fancy ones, but to partnership with academics and vendors to prototype and study nice ones. If you are in IT depts you will have to mix pricing with big data requirement: more data to use, faster, disseminate to more people. Quants will have to face other challenges outside of pricing: dealing with liquidity at any scale, quant asset management, and big data new challenges (not only use bog data and process them fast, but implement "client relationship management" using facebook like techniques, use open data, etc). But it is another story...
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.