How Repo Rates and Securities Lending Fees Relate for Special Collateral
Summary
The explanation distinguishes the financing economics of general collateral from the securities lending value of a special bond. A repo is presented as a collateralized loan whose interest is embedded in the difference between the purchase and repurchase prices; a reverse repo reverses the direction of cash provision. With general collateral, the asset primarily secures the loan, and the financing rate is typically tied to a reference rate or quoted as a fixed rate. An open transaction is characterized as overnight financing that can be rolled at the prevailing rate.
When a security is in demand from short sellers, its lending value can make it special. A dealer acquiring that security may offer cash financing below the market rate, including a negative spread, because the dealer expects to earn securities lending fees by lending the bond onward. The explanation is conceptual and does not give a conversion formula for every market quotation, nor does it cover operational, collateral, haircut, or counterparty details. It clarifies the relationship between financing terms and the value of borrowable securities.
Key ideas
- Repo interest is reflected in the repurchase price relative to the initial transaction price.
- General collateral typically earns a market financing rate, while open financing is rolled at prevailing overnight rates.
- A security becomes special when borrowers value access to it for short selling.
- Dealers may offer below-market financing to acquire special collateral and earn lending fees by lending it onward.
Tags
Full text
# Securities lending vs repo transactions # Securities lending vs repo transactions I have recently started on a repo/SBL trading desk and I am struggling to understand some theory. Normally, in a secured hard-to-borrow secured transaction, I pledge general collateral, receive the desired bond and pay a fee for this service, for example 20 basis points. Intuitively, the greater the demand for the bond, the higher borrowing cost, the higher the fee. This makes sense. However, this transaction is quoted as a percentage a lot of the time and I do not know how the bps are converted to a percentage/'all-in price'. Is it the fee + the hypothetical reverse repo rate if I was to pledge cash rather than a bond? Is it the fee + the return of the underlying? The fact these transactions are regularly done on open with no fixed end date confuses matters further. Any help on this would be massively appreciated. ## Answer by AlRacoon (score 3) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/79160 Repo and Reverse Repo transactions are basically collateralized loans. As with any loan, the interest can be quoted as a fixed percent, or a spread to a reference rate. In a Repo transaction, one is lending money to a dealer by buying a asset from a dealer and agreeing to sell the asset back to the dealer at a later date at a different price. The difference in prices represents the interest earned by the provider of funds to the dealer. In other words, the interest earned is embedded in the "repurchase" price. A Reverse Repo is just the opposite. The dealer is providing a loan to the counterparty. The owner of an asset, sells the asset to a dealer at a price and agrees to buy it back at another price. The difference in the prices represents the interest that is paid to the dealer for borrowing funds. The asset that is sold basically serves as collateral which the loan provider holds as security for providing the funds. The asset can be sold if the (close out) if the borrower fails to "repurchase" the asset from the fund provider (the "repurchase" is the repayment of the funds + interest). With "general collateral", the asset doesn't have any "securities lending value" and therefore only serves as collateral for the loan. In this case, the dealer will ask a market rate for the loan (i.e. SOFR + spd, or an equivalent fixed rate) for the term of the loan. When it is open ended, it is basically an overnight loan, which can be rolled every day at the prevailing overnight rate. When the asset has "securities lending value", the asset becomes special. Someone is looking to short the asset and willing to borrow the asset and pay the securities lending fees. As the dealer can now "lend the securities" and earn securities lending fees on the asset, they are eager to acquire the asset. In order to induce the owner of the asset to Reverse Repo (reverse in) the asset to them, they will quote a lower interest rate to provide funds, or a negative spread to the reference rate (in extreme cases, the dealer may actually pay the asset owner by quoting a negative interest rate). The owner of the asset, can borrow funds at a sub-market rate and invest at a market rate and earn a spread. The dealer can now lend the asset and earn securities lending fees, part of which is paid to the original owner of the asset in the form of a below market interest rate loan.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.