How Risk-Free Portfolios Can Be Built from Risky Assets
Summary
The discussion distinguishes a risk-free asset from a risk-free portfolio and explains that a simplified model may assume an asset with a deterministic return. In practice, central government instruments or money-market rates are often used as approximations, but the replies stress that genuine zero risk depends on the definition, investment horizon, purchasing power, and default assumptions. A portfolio can also have zero variance even when its components are risky.
Examples include exploiting inconsistent prices across markets, combining perfectly negatively correlated assets in proportions that offset their movements, or using derivatives to create a synthetic risk-free position. Such hedges depend on assumptions about correlations, volatilities, trading costs, market impact, and rebalancing. The answers do not provide a single universal solution to the original two-asset exercise; they outline alternative theoretical scenarios and emphasize that their practical risk-free status is conditional.
Key ideas
- A risk-free asset is defined relative to assumptions about deterministic returns, default, purchasing power, and horizon.
- A portfolio can have zero variance even when its constituent assets are individually risky.
- Perfect negative correlation can permit a hedge that offsets asset price movements under the assumed relationship.
- Arbitrage and derivative overlays can create synthetic positions, but their risk depends on market and model assumptions.
Tags
Full text
# What assets other than bonds are risk free? # What assets other than bonds are risk free? I saw a question the other day that said > Assume you have only two assets to build a portfolio. Name and explain three scenarios under which a completely risk-free portfolio can be formed? I have a few questions: - Is this poorly worded? Surely there are no assets that are completely risk-free. Should this be written as "virtually risk-free"? If not, how can an asset have absolutely zero risk? - The only assets I can think of that would be virtually risk-free are AAA-rated corporate bonds and low-yield western government bonds, i.e. US treasuries. So from my knowledge of only two asset-types that are virtually risk-free, you could only construct one scenario - a portfolio consisting of both US treasuries and AAA corporate bonds. Where is my knowledge lacking? - What is the correct answer? ## Answer by user9403 (score 3) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25073 Note the words "Assume" and "Scenarios". These words imply that you do not need to concern yourself with any assets that actually exist. A simple model of a market may have only one asset...clearly a vastly simplifying assumption and scenario. In this case we only have two assets. Again, this is a vastly simplifying scenario. This is a toy model which can help us understand the messiness that is real life financial markets. Here is one of your three scenarios: you have two assets,one of which is risk free (ie, has deterministic outcome in all states of the world relative to buying power): simply buy the risk free asset and don't buy the other (presumably not risk free) asset. ## Answer by Manley (score 2) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/63348 Risk-free assets refer to assets with a definite rate of return and no risk of default. From the perspective of mathematical statistics, risk-free assets refer to assets with zero variance or standard deviation of investment returns. Of course, the covariance and correlation coefficient between the rate of return of risk-free assets and the rate of return of risky assets are also zero. From a theoretical point of view, only fully indexed bonds issued by the central government with a maturity matching the length of the investor’s investment period can be regarded as risk-free assets. In the real economy, there are very few securities in circulation that fully meet the above conditions. Therefore, in investment practice, risk-free assets are generally regarded as money market instruments, such as the Treasury bill interest rate LIBOR. ## Answer by ApplePie (score 1) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25083 The trick to this question is that you are asked to build a risk-free portfolio, so its individual assets can be risky assets. - Imperfect markets - If there are price inconsistencies on different markets, say market A is high and market B is low, you can build a risk-free portfolio which nets to a profit by buying a security on market B for a low price and selling to market A for a higher price. - Perfect negative correlations - If two assets have a perfect negative correlations such that any price movement in security A is perfectly offset by price movements in security B, then a portfolio of equals parts A and B is risk-free as it is perfectly hedged. ## Answer by HyperVol (score 0) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25085 Many have quoted a delta hedged option to be a risk free asset. However, I totally beg to differ here because by risk free asset , we mean a guaranteed return in future ( which is not the case with dh option). Also , a delta hedged option still has vega risk. However, In my opinion , other than treasury , you can consider your savings bank account as a risk free asset ! ## Answer by demully (score 0) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/63350 - Either or both assets have are "risk-free" (in the sense of zero volatility, or guaranteed short-term returns). One could then build a portfolio using it/these, ignoring risky assets. - If the assets are perfectly correlated, or perfectly negatively correlated, AND you have confidence in their volatilities, then one could construct a zero vol portfolio hedging the two assets. Which is only as "risk-free" as one's confidence in assumed vol, and the ability to frictionlessly trade without cost or market impact etc. (to rebalance the portfolio). - If both assets are risky but either has liquid futures (or options), then one can sell these (or short-call, long-put overlay) these to convert a synthetic risk-free asset to invest in.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.