Skip to content
All library documents

How to Distinguish EBIT, EBITDA, and EBT in Financial Statements

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user113156

Summary

The document explains how EBIT and EBITDA relate to operating earnings, interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. EBIT measures income from core operations before interest and taxes; EBITDA adds back depreciation and amortization, which are noncash expenses, though it is only a rough cash flow proxy and does not account for capital spending. EBT includes financing costs before taxes, so an EBIT calculation should exclude interest expense.

The response cautions against grouping statement line items mechanically as revenues or expenses. Financial statements vary by company and accounting standard, and individual items may not fit a generalized template. The practical guidance is to identify what each item represents and interpret the measure being calculated. The document provides conceptual distinctions rather than a worked calculation, and the supplied statement’s line-item labels alone may not be enough to classify every item reliably.

Key ideas

  • EBIT represents operating income before interest and taxes.
  • EBITDA adds depreciation and amortization back to EBIT but is an imperfect proxy for cash flow.
  • Interest expense belongs in the calculation of earnings before tax, not EBIT.
  • Financial statement items vary, so each item should be understood before it is classified.

Tags

Full text
# Question on EBIT Calculation


# Question on EBIT Calculation












I am trying to calculate the EBIT and a few other financial calculations from the following Income Statement. What numbers would I have to correspond in order to calculate EBIT or EBITDA here?

```
A:Revenues: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 13 + 14 + 16
B:Expenses: 6 + 7 + 9 + 10 + 15 + 17 + 19
C:EBITDA: A + B
D:EBIT: C + 8 + 11 +12 + 18
Net Income: D + 20
```

Am I correct in firstly splitting it into Revenue and expenses?

```
    Income statement
    1. Net Turnover
    2. Variation in stocks of finished goods and work in progress
    3. Works for its own assets
    4. Supplies
    5. Other operating income
    6. Labour cost
    7. Other operating costs
    8. Amortization of fixed assets
    9. Allocation of subventions on non financial investments and other
    10. Provisions excess
    11. Deterioration and result for fixed assets disposal
    12. Negative difference of business combinations
    13. Other results
    A) Operating result (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13)

    14. Financial income
    a) Allocation of financial legacies, grants and subventions
    b) Other financial income
    15. Financial expenses
    16. Reasonable value variation on financial instruments
    17. Exchange differences
    18. Deterioration and result for disposal of financial instruments
    19. Other income and expenses of a financial nature
    a) Addition to assets of financial expenses
    b) Income from financial arrangements with creditors
    c) Other income and expenses
    B) Financial result (14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 + 19)

    C) Result before taxes (A + B)

    20. Taxes on profits

    D) Exercise result (A4 + 20)
```

## Answer by Lennart_R (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/37335

Basically everything seems to be flawed including revenues and expenses.

I have no idea what accounting standards you are following here, but I'd recommend you try and understand what you are actually calculating instead of throwing together more complex single items.

Revenues: everything, that a business receives for its normal business activity; financial income etc. is only later added into the pre-tax income (EBT)

EBIT: is your operating income, i.e. revenues less the expenses that were incurred from generating the given revenues. Interpretation: what does the firm earn (before interest/taxes) from its core business activities?

EBITDA vs. EBIT: We add back Net Depreciation and Amortization onto EBIT, because they actually do not resemble cash outflows in reality; EBITDA is supposed to be a cash flow proxy - especially in IB this is heartily debated, as obviously CAPEX plays a huge role when estimating cash flows

EBIT vs. EBT: Your EBIT calculation seems to be net of interest expense, which is wrong: remember that taxes are applied after deducting interest (i.e. EBT) instead of before (EBIT).

Takeaway: Although supposed to be standardized, the income statements (especially singular items) will differ between firms, therefore it makes a lot more sense to understand and be able to interpret what you are calculating instead of following some generalized scheme. I hope this helped you.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.