Inferring Equity Borrow Costs from Option Prices
Summary
The document discusses whether equity option prices can reveal the stock lending rate faced by a market maker hedging short positions. Put-call parity links a matched call and put to the underlying, financing, dividends, and borrow costs, so deviations from standard parity can reflect borrowing conditions. One proposed approach is to use same-strike, same-expiration options and adjust rate and volatility assumptions until theoretical prices and market quotes align.
The answers caution that this does not generally identify a unique borrow rate. Put and call demand can widen parity-based arbitrage bounds, and option pairs across strikes or expirations may imply different rates. Another approach estimates the forward from spot and matched option prices, then attributes the residual after accounting for dividends and interest to borrowing. That inference depends on accurate dividend and financing estimates; uncertain payouts make it less reliable. The document offers conceptual methods and caveats, but no empirical validation or universally applicable estimator.
Key ideas
- Put-call parity connects matched equity options with financing, dividends, and the underlying price.
- Parity deviations can reflect borrow costs but may also arise from imbalanced put and call demand.
- Fitting rate and volatility inputs to matched options can produce an implied rate, though results may vary across pairs.
- A forward inferred from option prices can help estimate borrow costs after accounting for interest and dividends.
- Uncertain dividends and inaccurate financing assumptions limit the reliability of the estimate.
Tags
Full text
# How to solve for the implied stock lending rate given equity options prices? # How to solve for the implied stock lending rate given equity options prices? When market makers price options on hard-to-borrow equities, they include the cost to borrow the underlying equity that their broker is going to charge them to sell the security short to hedge. I'm trying to back-out this cost. I'm guessing it is similar to implied volatility but I'm solving for the interest rate. Can anyone point me in the right direction? ## Answer by Tal Fishman (score 6) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/1812 The cost of the hedge does not appear directly in the price for any one option, but rather will appear as an apparent violation of put-call parity. However, due to differing demand for puts and calls, this merely widens the arbitrage bounds ordinarily set by put-call parity, but does not imply a single implied borrow rate. In other words, the borrow rate is an input to establishing the put-call parity bounds. One can reverse the relationship to obtain a lower limit on the borrow rate, but an upper limit cannot be inferred. ## Answer by michaelcarniol (score 6) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/1843 As 'sheegaon' suggested, you can solve for an implied interest rate -- which is not necessarily the cost of borrowing the underlying stock -- using put-call parity. As you probably know, an implied volatility algorithm increases and decreases its implied volatility guess until the theoretical price and market prices of an option converge. Similarly, to imply options' interest rate and implied volatility, take a put and call pair with the same strike and expiration, and increase or decrease their interest rate and implied volatility inputs until put-call parity holds and the put and call theoretical and market prices converge. In building such algorithms, I take advantage of the property that puts have positive and calls have negative sensitivity to interest rates, while both calls and puts have positive sensitivity to implied volatility. Note that put-call pairs of different strikes or expirations often imply different rates. ## Answer by OGC (score 6) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/36470 I realize I'm resurrecting an old thread, but I don't think the answers were clear enough. You can get a really good estimate for borrow rate by doing: Calculate the forward by adding Strike Price + Call Price - Put Price. The forward rate represents Spot - dividends + interest - borrow rate. The forward rate is also (Forward ÷ Spot) - 1. If you can accurately estimate dividends and interest rates, then the remainder would be the cost to borrow implied by the options market. ## Answer by DKM (score 2) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/2585 Please be aware when you back out implied interest rate for stocks with uncertain dividend payout.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.