Skip to content
All library documents

Integrated CIR Distributions and Conditional Independence

Article Quant Q&A · Author: TheBridge

Summary

The document asks whether the time integral of a Cox–Ingersoll–Ross (CIR) process can be represented as a sum of independent random variables, drawing on decompositions known for the integral conditional on the process’s starting and ending values. The answer argues that an unconditional representation of this kind is not available through simply summing independent process samples: CIR is mean-reverting and serially correlated, so values at different times are dependent. Approximating the integral with finer time slices does not remove that dependence.

The cited decomposition for the endpoint-conditioned integral uses information about both endpoints and a squared Ornstein–Uhlenbeck bridge. That conditioning changes the distributional problem enough to permit a representation involving independent components. The question also supplies a closed-form Laplace transform, but the answer does not derive a decomposition from it. This is a theoretical discussion of a particular stochastic process; the response gives an argument and references rather than a full proof or a simulation procedure.

Key ideas

  • CIR values across time are serially correlated because the process is mean-reverting.
  • A time-slice approximation to the integral therefore does not consist of independent samples.
  • The answer distinguishes the unconditional integral from its distribution conditional on both endpoint values.
  • The cited independent-component decomposition applies to the endpoint-conditioned integral through a squared Ornstein–Uhlenbeck bridge.
  • A closed-form Laplace transform alone is presented without a derivation of an independent-sum representation.

Tags

Full text
# Law of an integrated CIR Process as sum of Independent Random Variables


# Law of an integrated CIR Process as sum of Independent Random Variables












It is known (see for example Joshi-Chan "Fast and Accureate Long Stepping Simulation of the Heston SV Model" available at SSRN) that for a CIR process defined as :

$$dY_t= \kappa(\theta -Y_t)dt+ \omega \sqrt{Y_t}dW_t$$ $Y_0=Y$ together with a correct set of constraints on parameters' value.

Then the law of $\int_0^T Y_t dt$ conditionaly on $Y_0,Y_T$ can be seen as the sum of three (rather complicated) independent random variables (see proposition 4 eq 2.10 in Joshi Chan article)

NB : The original result is coming from Glassermann and Kim "Gamma Expansion of the Heston Stochastic Volatility Model" available at SSRN, but I'm more used to Joshi Chan's expression.

So here is my question :

Does the integrated CIR process itself by any chance has such a representation in the form of the sum of independent random variables ?

PS: The Laplace transform has a known closed-form expression but I couldn't infer directly from this such a representation.

Edit : As Tal has opened a bounty on this here is the Laplace transform of the integrated CIR process :

$$\mathcal{L}\left\{\int_0^t Y_s ds\right\}(\lambda)=\mathbb{E}\left[e^{-\lambda\int_0^t Y_s ds}\right]=e^{-A_\lambda(t)-Y_0.G_\lambda(t)}$$ with $A_\lambda(t)=-\frac{2\kappa.\theta }{\omega^2}. \mathrm{Ln}\left[\frac{2\gamma.e^{(\gamma+\kappa).t/2}}{\gamma.(e^{t.\gamma}+1)+\kappa.(e^{t.\gamma}-1)}\right]$ and $G_\lambda(t)=\frac{2.\lambda.(e^{t.\gamma}-1)}{\gamma.(e^{t.\gamma}+1)+\kappa.(e^{t.\gamma}-1)} $ where $\gamma=\sqrt{\kappa^2+\omega^2.\lambda}$

This is coming from Chesnay, Jeanblanc-Picqué, Yor "Mathematical Methods for Financial Markets" Proposition 6.3.4.1

Best regards

## Answer by kurtosis (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/56000

> Does the integrated CIR process itself by any chance has such a representation in the form of the sum of independent random variables?

I think the answer to this is clearly "no." The CIR process is (as @DavidAddison points out in comments above) like an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. The mean-reverting property of the O-U (and the CIR) mean that the process is serially-correlated. Therefore, you would be hard-pressed to find a sum of independent random variables to represent $\int_0^T Y_t dt$.

To flesh this out more: we know the distribution of $Y_T$ if we are given only $Y_0$. We can also find the distribution of $Y_{T/2}$. However, $Y_{T/2}$ and $Y_T$ are not independent, they are correlated.

Perhaps we could interpolate more frequently, since that will be needed to approximate the interval (numerically or taking a limit). If we interpolate more frequently, however, we run into the same problem: the samples are serially-correlated to one another. Thus the boxes we create to approximate our integral cannot be independent of one another.

How, then, did Chan and Joshi (and Glasserman and Kim before them) decompose $\int_0^T Y_t dt$? By conditioning on $Y_0$ and $Y_T$, they have a squared Ornstein-Uhlenbeck bridge. Just as with a Brownian bridge, that give them more information about the distribution of values in $(0,T)$. In this case, that information is enough to write down the integrated CIR process as a sum of three independent variables (which are themselves sums of independent variables having different distributions).

For more on this, Theorem 2.1 of Glasserman and Kim is informative (and has references to the decomposition which was originally proven by Pitman and Yor).

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.