Interpreting Interest Rate Differentials in Exchange Rate Dynamics
Summary
The document examines a stochastic differential equation for an exchange rate quoted as domestic currency per unit of foreign currency. It asks whether a rise in the domestic interest rate should strengthen the domestic currency and push that quoted rate lower. The responses explain that the equation’s interest rate differential follows from no-arbitrage relationships and describes the modeled drift under its assumptions; it does not, by itself, model how a rate change causes the spot exchange rate to move.
The discussion also emphasizes quote direction: for EUR/USD, one euro is converted into dollars, so the dollar is domestic in the stated convention. Under that definition, the equation’s sign can make the exchange rate rise with the domestic-minus-foreign rate differential. These explanations are conceptual and model-dependent; observed spot responses to rate changes require additional assumptions or empirical modeling.
Key ideas
- The interpretation of an exchange rate equation depends on which currency is domestic and how the pair is quoted.
- The domestic-minus-foreign rate differential appears through no-arbitrage modeling.
- The equation does not establish a causal spot exchange rate response to a change in interest rates.
- Expected sign interpretations can reverse when the quotation convention is misunderstood.
- Empirical links between rate changes and spot FX movements need explicit modeling.
Tags
Full text
# The relation between exchange rate SDE and respective interest rates
# The relation between exchange rate SDE and respective interest rates
The exchange rate between a domestic currency money market and a foreign currency money market can be expressed as $$ dQ(t) = (r_d - r_f)Q(t)dt + \sigma Q(t)d\tilde{W}(t) $$ where $r_d$ is the interest rate for the domestic market, and $r_f$ for foreign.
In my head, I believe that the exchange rate should decrease when the domestic interest rate goes up, indicating the domestic currency is strengthening. For example if the Fed were to increase rates, then $EUR/USD$ should decrease, given that the ECB doesn't do much. So, if $EUR/USD$ was 1.14 yesterday, it should be below 1.14 today.
To my understanding, the SDE for $Q(t)$ doesn't seem to reflect this fact. It seems that $Q(t)$ would increase if $r_d$ were to go up. I would like to resolve this contradiction, so any help would be appreciated.
## Answer by dm63 (score 4, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25746
I think you are right. The SDE does not attempt to describe the dynamics of the spot exchange rate with respect to random changes in interest rates. Rather, it describes the evolution of the FX rate as a drift term proportional to the rate differential, plus a random term. Specifically, it says that if domestic rates go up, the rate at which the foreign currency strengthens in the forward market, relative to spot, goes up. It doesn't say anything about what happens to the spot FX rate in this situation.
## Answer by Gordon (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25745
The dynamics for the exchange rate $Q$ that converts one unit foreign currency to units of domestic currency is given by \begin{align*} dQ(t) = Q(t)\big[(r_d-r_f)dt + \sigma dW_t \big], \end{align*} where $r_d$ and $r_f$ are, respectively, the domestic and foreign interest rates.
In your example, the exchange rate EUR/USD is to convert on unit EUR to units of USD. Here, EUR is the foreign currency, and USD is the domestic currency. If the US Fed raises the USD interest rate, $r_d$, while there is no change in ECB for the EUR interest rate $r_f$, then $Q(t)$ will increase. There is no contradiction.
You confusion may be caused by the notation EUR/USD, where you might have treated the US Fed rate as $r_f$.
## Answer by parisjazz (score 0)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/42664
The term rd - rf results from the non arbitrage condition rather than an explicit modelling of the fx rate in terms of interest rates. In the extreme case of a fixed exchange rate (sigma=0), the term rd - rf simply states that investing in the cash account of the foreign currency is equivalent to investing in the cash account of the local currency, modulo the exchange rate.
The fx rate itself is driftless similar to a future, ie it doesn't provide any return.
The fact that the fx rate goes up or down depending on an interest rate is an empirical observation that needs to be explicitly modelled, ie it doesn't magically derive from the basic stochastic equation.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.