Skip to content
All library documents

Intraday Hedging with Leveraged ETFs and Daily Rebalancing

Article Quant Q&A · Author: LazyCat
Read the original

Summary

The discussion considers whether an investor can hedge an intraday position in a financial-sector fund such as XLF with an inverse leveraged fund such as FAZ. It explains that a nominal three-times inverse exposure could provide a close intraday offset if both funds tracked the same benchmark, but the example funds actually follow different indexes. Their holdings may overlap, yet the hedge would not be exact.

The key risk is the leveraged fund’s daily reset. The hedge ratio can drift as the market moves, and the position must be adjusted around the close: the answer describes selling some inverse fund after an up move and buying more after a down move. This is a conceptual explanation rather than a measured trading study. It does not quantify transaction costs, tracking error, or optimal rebalance timing, and it explicitly sets aside the benchmark mismatch for its simplified illustration.

Key ideas

  • A leveraged inverse ETF may roughly offset a related position intraday if the funds track similar exposures.
  • The example ETFs follow different benchmarks, so their returns and holdings will not match exactly.
  • Daily leverage resets change the hedge relationship over time and can require a closing rebalance.
  • The discussion gives no empirical estimate of hedge error, trading costs, or an optimal rebalance rule.

Tags

EquitiesRisk managementExecutionUS markets
Full text
# Do people hedge with leveraged ETFs intraday? How?


# Do people hedge with leveraged ETFs intraday? How?












Seems that the answer to the first part should be yes, but haven't seen any references or examples. E.g. suppose I want to hedge XLF position with FAZ. Do people use close to current returns, or just recent? What's the risk / cost of intraday rebalance?

## Answer by ljump12 (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/14411

Yes.

First, XLF and FAZ do not track the same underlying benchmark. -> XLF tracks the S&P Financials Select Sector Index -> FAZ tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index I'll ignore that for this sake, because their baskets are likely still very similar.

Pretending their benchmarks were the same, you would theoretically have a dead on (3x) hedge intraday. However, at the close of each day, you would be out of hedge. As soon as the market closes you would need to sell a bit of FAZ if the market is up, and buy a bit of FAZ if the market is down.

It's important to understand the underlying process of leveraged ETF's, and their need to rehedge at the end of the day. There's many good articles on the subject, a quick look found one: http://math.nyu.edu/faculty/avellane/LETFRISKPROF.pdf

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.