Skip to content
All library documents

Legal Risks of Using Public and Paid Financial Data

Article Quant Q&A · Author: boulder_ruby

Summary

The discussion separates physically taking data from copying or using it, then focuses on whether factual financial information can be reused commercially. Its answer argues that copying may raise copyright issues even when information comes from public filings or a reseller, and that paid data access can also be limited by the vendor’s terms and the user’s stated purpose. It recommends discussing a specific use with the provider and notes that commercial firms may negotiate data access.

The document cites a dispute involving derivatives documentation as support for its warning, but it does not explain the ruling in detail or analyze the different scenarios posed, such as scraping a public site versus using an API. Its claims are a forum answer rather than jurisdiction-specific legal advice, and it does not establish a general rule for all factual market data, providers, or commercial uses. Traders and researchers should treat it as a prompt to investigate licensing and copyright constraints, not as a definitive legal conclusion.

Key ideas

  • Copying data can create legal issues even though it does not physically remove information from its source.
  • The answer distinguishes copyright infringement from the colloquial idea of stealing.
  • Public availability does not necessarily mean financial data is free for commercial reuse.
  • Paid data access may depend on licensing terms and the specific intended use.
  • The discussion offers a limited forum opinion rather than a general legal analysis.

Tags

Full text
# 4258


# Is it possible to “steal” financial data on publicly traded companies off the internet? Legally, I mean, what is the truth about “data” as a property












What constitutes "stealing" when it comes to publicly posted financial data?

I think there are three instances of this that we can individually vet:

- a.) you physically broke into a location or physically broke into a computer to take the information. this is wrong. this is not ok.

- b.) you're getting the information off of sites like google finance and yahoo finance, etc, using some automated scraping tools you've written that use things like, say, wget and ruby, and do daily scrapes to each and every company

- c.) you're getting the information off of a paid service like x.com that sells financial data. you have told these people that you are using the data for some purpose other than what you're using the data for (because these people are salespeople and they don't actually have quoted rates, they sell data access like they sell cars), and they have agreed to sell it to you at a reasonable rate because you're not re-syndicating it. In reality, even, you're not re-syndicating the data, you're just using it to create a product that uses, say, 1% of that data at any given moment and does not sell it to others in any string-readable-format.

I'm not interested in ethics here. My ethics state that this information should be free already in a readily accessible format. I'm interested in the legality (and practical reality of) data-acquisition on the internet.

Am I legally allowed to take and use factual data (viz. non-creative content) for my own commercial purposes? Can I just take information? Is it considered "intellectual property"? Is data on publicly traded financial companies property at all? Could it ever be? I'm not trying to load the discussion, but I do have an opinion on this.

Opinions, however, are not what I'm asking for, though you're welcome to share them. I'm interested in

- a.) legality

- b.) the practical reality of data-acquisition (what do companies like Accenture and McKinsey do to get their data?)

edge cases ("would it be legal if"):

- you scraped a public site's data and used it in the making of a commercial project

- you scraped a private (paid, premium) site's data and used it in the making of a commercial project

- you used a public REST API to get data and used that in the making of a commercial project

- you used a private/premium/paid REST API to get data and used that in the making of a commercial project

## Answer by CQM (score 4)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/4279

there is no stealing of data unless you delete it from the original source. Let me elaborate, as the semantics are very important here. Stealing, even with quotes around it, "Stealing" requires that something is removed from the original place. You steal car. You copy a file, as such data is protected via copyright when it can and other subsequent acts that essentially provide remedies for unauthorized use outside the scope of copyright.

Therefore, financial data on public filings is protected by copyright, and it doesn't matter if it is posted in the SEC's database or a site reselling it. The question you are asking is about copyright infringement and what rights you have.

This very question was challenged by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

http://www.pattishall.com/pdf/8-17-10_Copyright_Infringement_in_Edgar_Docs_Blog_Post.pdf

and it was determined by a court that the entity was infringing on the copyrights of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.

so, as it was suggested, you would need to talk to the data vendor to determine if your specific application is legitimate to them and you may need to cut a deal (Accenture and McKinsey do). Because it absolutely will not be state-sanctioned by default.

This should help answer your question.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.