Skip to content
All library documents

LIBOR Forward Curves, Tenor Risk, and OIS Discounting

Article Quant Q&A · Author: tg36

Summary

The document distinguishes a curve of rates across lending tenors from a forward curve for a single LIBOR tenor. A three-month LIBOR forward curve describes rates for successive future three-month periods; it is not just today’s three-month fixing. Similar curves can be built for other tenors.

It explains that before the financial crisis, practitioners often inferred forward rates across tenors using a compounded-rate relationship. That approach assumed short-term lending could be rolled over without added risk. The crisis highlighted credit and funding risks that differ by tenor, so modern curve construction treats tenors separately and uses basis instruments to observe differences between them. The document also distinguishes projection from discounting: LIBOR tenor curves project floating rates, while an OIS curve is typically used to discount cash flows. This is a high-level explanation; it does not provide a full bootstrapping procedure or cover the transition away from LIBOR.

Key ideas

  • A forward curve for a given LIBOR tenor gives rates for future periods of that same tenor.
  • A curve of spot lending rates across different tenors is distinct from a single-tenor forward curve.
  • Compounding across LIBOR tenors once relied on an assumption that short-term loans could be rolled over.
  • Different tenor credit and funding risks mean their forward rates cannot generally be inferred from one shared curve.
  • LIBOR curves project rates, while OIS curves are typically used to discount cash flows.

Tags

Full text
# A libor curve VS A 3-month or 6-month libor curve


# A libor curve VS A 3-month or 6-month libor curve












I'm very confused about the terms regarding libor curves in general.

When people talk about libor curve, I picture it as a curve with different libor maturities (i.e. 1 week, 1 month, 3-month and 6-month etc.).

However I can't picture what a 3-month or 6-month libor curve look like, isn't that just a single value at that time? can someone please kindly explain?

And also when people talk about forecasting a libor, what do they mean? How is it connected with bootstrapping method?

Thanks so much in advance for helping!

## Answer by dm63 (score 6)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/33421

A 3 month libor curve is a set of forward rates for 3 month libor. Thus, the curve begins at where 3 month libor is today , and takes different values for each possible forward observation date. Loosely speaking, this curve represents where the market thinks 3 month libor will set in the future.

The analogous statement holds for 1mo libor , 6 month libor , etc.

A curve consisting of lending rates for various tenors 1 week, 1 month, 3 month etc is an interbank lending curve but this is not normally referred to as "the libor curve".

## Answer by Helin (score 4)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/33430

There are a lot of intricacies involved, and I'll focus on high-level stuff.

Let's go back to the basics. If we have the 3-month LIBOR rate and the 6-month LIBOR rate, can we calculate the 3-month forward 3-month LIBOR rate? Before the financial crisis, the answer was typically assumed to be yes. The math is simple:

$$\left(1 + \frac{\text{3-month LIBOR}}{4}\right)\left(1 + \frac{\text{3-month forward 3-month LIBOR}}{4}\right) = 1 + \frac{\text{6-month LIBOR}}{2}.$$

You can apply similar math to calculate any forward rate, be it an $x$-year forward 3-month rate, or an $x$-year forward 12-month rate.

But going back to the formula above, it assumes that after the first three months, your counterparty will be there to roll your maturing loan into another three-month loan. During the financial crisis, rolling these short-term loans became a serious issue, and people woke up to realize that LIBOR was not as risk free as they thought. The implications are profound and extend beyond short-term loans. For longer maturity swaps, for example, people realized that discounting cash flows using LIBOR resulted in them holding insufficient collateral to cover losses.

So nowadays, we have to account for the fact that LIBORs of different tenors are not only NOT risk-free, but carry different degrees of risk. A three-month LIBOR and a six-month LIBOR no longer belong to the same curve, and the 3-month forward 3-month LIBOR cannot be imputed from them (there are in fact traded instruments, 3s6s basis, that tell us how much this risk is worth). Accordingly, we build 1-month LIBOR curves for $x$-year forward 1-month curve, 3-month LIBOR curve for $x$-year forward 3-month rate, etc. None of these curves are used to discount cash flows; for that, yet another curve, typically the OIS curve, is required.

See MULTIPLE CURVE CONSTRUCTION for a discussion of how modern yield curves are constructed.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.