Mapping Short-Dated Equity Option Vega to FRTB Tenors
Summary
The document considers how to calculate and bucket vega risk for an equity option expiring in a short period under the Basel market risk framework. The question asks whether an option shorter than the first prescribed maturity tenor should carry sensitivity to that tenor, and how interpolation should work. The response distinguishes the option’s own maturity-specific vega calculation from the regulatory mapping of that sensitivity to a standard risk factor tenor.
Under the interpretation given, calculate the option’s vega using the bank’s pricing system at its actual maturity, then map the sensitivity to the first listed bucket. This makes its exposure eligible to net against other options assigned to the same bucket, including those with different actual maturities. The response describes one reading of the rules rather than a detailed implementation or an authoritative regulatory determination. It does not show interpolation formulas, numerical examples, or treatment of other maturity ranges.
Key ideas
- Calculate option vega using its actual maturity in the bank’s pricing system.
- Map a short-dated equity option’s vega sensitivity to the first prescribed maturity bucket.
- Regulatory bucket assignment can allow options with different actual maturities to net together.
- The response offers an interpretation of the framework and does not provide a full interpolation procedure.
Tags
Full text
# Market risk FRTB: calculation of Vega risk charge
# Market risk FRTB: calculation of Vega risk charge
I recently started working on a project that requires me to deal with the new market risk standard issued by the Basel Committe: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d457_faq.pdf
I am trying to calculate the vega risk charge for an equity option that expires in 1.5 months. The idea behind is to apply 1bps point shock to the implied vol. surface on specific tenors, divide the delta PV by 1bps and multiply the result by the implied vol on the shocked tenor.
Following the instructions:
'The equity vega risk factors are the implied volatilities of options that reference the equity spot prices as underlyings as defined along one dimension, the maturity of the option. This is defined as the implied volatility of the option as mapped to one or several of the following maturity tenors: 0.5 years, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 10 years.'
and further: The assignment of risk factors to the specified tenors should be performed by linear interpolation or a method that is most consistent with the pricing functions used by the independent risk control function of a bank to report market risks or P&L to senior management.
However, expiring in 1.5 months the option should not have sensitivity on the 0.5 year tenor right? How should i interpolate in this case?
Thanks very much for all those that can provide any help. Chris
## Answer by Attack68 (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/49786
My reading of it is this:
> Sensitivity definitions for vega risk 21.25 The option-level vega risk sensitivity to a given risk factor[8] is measured by multiplying vega by the implied volatility of the option as follows, where: (1) vega,$\frac{\partial V_i}{\partial \sigma_i}$, is defined as the change in the market value of the option $V_i$ as a result of a small amount of change to the implied volatility $\sigma_i$; and (2) the instrument’s vega and implied volatility used in the calculation of vega sensitivities must be sourced from pricing models used by the independent risk control unit of the bank: $s_k = vega × implied vol$ Footnote [8]: As specified in the vega risk factor definitions in [MAR21.8] to [MAR21.14], the implied volatility of the option must be mapped to one or more maturity tenors.
This equity option's vega sensitivity is calculated according to its 1.5month matrurity using the bank calculation system but it is mapped to the 0.5Y bucket.
If you had, for example, a short position in a 4month maturity option then that sensitivity could be netted against the 1.5month via the 0.5Y bucket.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.