Marking a Classic Repurchase Agreement to Market
Summary
A classic repurchase agreement is described as a collateralized borrowing: one party receives cash against a bond and later repays that cash plus repo interest to recover the bond. The example illustrates how the repurchase amount accrues using a money-market day-count convention. The discussion also explains that the cash advanced may be less than the collateral’s market value because the lender applies a haircut to protect against declines in collateral value and other risks.
For mark-to-market purposes, the collateral is valued at its current market value, including accrued interest or coupon amounts, while the cash leg can be estimated as the initial cash plus repo interest accrued to date. A more refined approach discounts the termination amount using the prevailing repo rate, which may differ from the rate fixed at trade inception. The valuation depends on whose perspective is being considered. The explanation is simplified: it sets aside counterparty risk and other adjustments that may matter in a complete valuation.
Key ideas
- A repo is economically a collateralized borrowing with a fixed repurchase price.
- The cash advanced may reflect a haircut against the collateral’s market value.
- Mark-to-market valuation considers both current collateral value and the cash obligation.
- The termination amount can be discounted using the current market repo rate.
- Counterparty and collateral risks may require further valuation adjustments.
Tags
Full text
# Valuation of repurchase agreement (classic repo) # Valuation of repurchase agreement (classic repo) From my understanding, a classic repo is an agreement for one party to get cash by placing collateral at a certain price and then get the collateral back at maturity by paying the initial cash plus repo interest. Say, 1m nominal of bond (dirty price 105%) are placed. Then party A receives 1.05m in exchange for the bond. Let the term repo be for 30 days, with repo rate 6%. Then party A will then pay 1.05m*(1+6%*30/360) = 1,055,250 to party B to get the bond back. My problem comes when I have to mark the repo to market. How is this done? Do we just discount the termination amount to the value date? Do we take the market value of the collateral (the bond) into account when valuing the repo? ## Answer by Magic is in the chain (score 6) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/42154 You are right in that in repo, one sells a collateral to another party and agrees to repurchase it at a fixed price in the future, and is essentially a collateralised borrowing. The difference between the fixed repurchase price and the initial sale price is essentially interest (repo rate), and is calculated using money market conventions as repos are usually short dated transactions. However, the initial cash would be based on the market value of the collateral, and usually the lender would apply a hair cut, say 2% so you get cash of 98% of the market value of the collateral. The repurchase price would be calculated based on this initial cash, so you will pay interest on what you borrowed. The haircut is to protect the lender in case the value of the collateral declines, or to reflect any other risks associated with the collateral such as illiquidity, wrong way risk etc. In exchange cleared transaction, intial margin plays similar role. In terms of mark to market value, it depends on the perspective but general principles are the same. The value of the collateral is its current market value, including any accrued interest/coupon etc as seller would be receiving any coupons paid during the life of the repo. The value of the cash leg is just initial cash plus accrued repo interest for simple calculations. For more accurate valuation, you can take the terminal value and discount it at the then market repo rate as an alternative. You have locked the interest at the rate agreed at the time of the transaction, but today rate could be different. I ignored counterparty risk etc, though you might need to take these into accounts for full valuation- e.g., the 2% haircut is unsecured lending to the counterparty? Hope this helps.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.