Skip to content
All library documents

Measuring Pair Trade Returns by Notional and Capital

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Akavall

Summary

The note distinguishes gross return on traded notional from return on capital employed for a long-short pair trade. In its example, the long and short legs each have the same initial dollar notional, and their combined gains produce a gross return calculated against the sum of the two notionals. A zero net cash investment does not make the trade’s gross return undefined when the gross notionals are used as the denominator.

Return on capital instead depends on the capital or margin tied up to support both legs, so it cannot be determined without the applicable leverage and margin details. Net return also requires subtracting funding and stock borrow charges. The answer cautions that returns can be added across legs for attribution, while risk does not aggregate linearly; the chosen return definition and denominator should therefore be stated explicitly.

Key ideas

  • Gross pair trade return can be measured against the combined notional of both legs.
  • Return on capital depends on the margin or capital committed to the trade.
  • Net return should account for funding and borrow costs.
  • Adding leg returns for attribution does not mean the pair's risk adds linearly.

Tags

Full text
# What is the proper way to calculate returns for Pair Trading?


# What is the proper way to calculate returns for Pair Trading?












Edit

I am assuming that I don't need to use margin account to short here:

What is a standard way to calculate return for pairs trading strategy? For example, I bought 100 dollars worth of a loser (L) and shorted 100 dollars worth of winner (W), and when their prices converged I sold L for 110 dollars worth, and paid 90 dollars for W. At the end I made dollars 20, but what is my return? Normally I would divide profit by investment, but here my net investment is zero, so I can't do that. It seems reasonable to count each of my 100 dollars positions as separate investments, in that case I would have:

$$ \mbox{return} = \frac{20}{100 + 100} * 100 \% = 10 \% $$

Is the above right? If not what is the proper method?

If I need to use a margin account:

> Under Regulation T, it is mandatory for short trades that 150% of the value of the position at the time the short is created be held in a margin account. This 150% is comprised of the full value of the short (100%), plus an additional margin requirement of 50% or half the value of the position. (The margin requirement for a long position is also 50%.) For example, if you were to short a stock and the position had a value of \$20,000, you would be required to have the \$20,000 that came from the short sale plus an additional \$10,000, for a total of $30,000, in the account to meet the requirements of Regulation T

Investopedia

Then I would need to put 100 * 1.5 = 150 in the margin account for shorting a winner, and buy 100 dollars worth a loser, so my return is: $$ \mbox{return} = \frac{20}{100 + 150} * 100\% = 8\% $$

I think the above is right, but a bit unsure.

Thank You

## Answer by Matt Wolf (score 6, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/7491

It depends on which return you precisely attempt to measure:





- Return on capital (employed): In this case you need to look at how much of your capital did you lock up/ margin in order to trade such position. Here, margins come into play. Obviously, your returns on leveraged investments will be much more pronounced when measured as return on capital rather than return on the actual notional traded, but your risk will also be magnified.

Now, a pair trade is really not much different in terms of return attribution from 2 separate trades. Thus all you do is you aggregate the returns (after you define precisely what return type you attempt to evaluate). Make sure you understand that risk is NOT aggregated because it does not linearly scale. But as this question is just about returns you should simply add return profiles of each leg together.

In your example if you longed 100 dollars and you shorted 100 dollars on another name then your total notional traded is 200 dollars. You generated an aggregate of 20 dollars and hence your gross return on the trade is 10%. Your net return depends on how much you paid in funding and borrow charges. Your return on capital depends on how much you leveraged your position. I can't answer it without knowing your leverage rate on this particular trade. But its pretty straight forward for you to derive.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.