Skip to content
All library documents

Methods for Modeling Time-Varying Dependence Between Two Series

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Jase

Summary

The document considers how to track changing dependence between two time series when a changing regression slope may reflect shifting variances rather than a stronger relationship. It raises similar interpretive concerns about time-varying quantile regression and cointegration, and asks whether dynamic correlation measures can capture nonlinear dependence.

The response clarifies that DCC-GARCH models jointly represent conditional variances and conditional correlations, so their correlation dynamics are not simply a static Pearson estimate. It also points to unobserved-components state-space models and multivariate stochastic-volatility models as alternatives for describing joint movements. These model families capture different aspects of dependence, and the discussion offers starting references rather than an empirical comparison or a prescribed selection rule. Choosing among them still requires defining the dependence of interest and assessing model fit for the data at hand.

Key ideas

  • A time-varying regression slope can move because the series' relative variances change.
  • DCC-GARCH jointly models conditional variances and evolving conditional correlations.
  • Unobserved-components models can represent changing joint behavior in a state-space framework.
  • Multivariate stochastic-volatility models offer another approach to modeling time-varying dependence.

Tags

Full text
# Alternative ways to understand time-varying comovement between two time-series?


# Alternative ways to understand time-varying comovement between two time-series?












I have been looking into ways to better understand how the dependencies/correlations/etc between two time series can vary over time.

I first thought about using a Kalman/particle filter over a linear model to get a time-varying slope estimate. However, I'm worried that this will also pick up changing relative variances between the two time series and an increasing slope estimate doesn't actually mean a stronger relationship between the two time-series.

I have looked into time-varying quantile regression but am unconvinced that a changing slope parameter means much, even if it accounts for asymmetry over the various quantiles. The same thing goes for the new time-varying cointegration technology.

I have other reservations about DCC-GARCH because to the best of my knowledge it's a time-varying estimate of the Pearson estimator and is therefore not able to pick up non-linear dependencies (since it's essentially the time-varying square root of the $R^2$ of a linear regression). I'm concerned that the DCC-GARCH correlation estimate might decrease because linear dependencies are reducing, even if non-linear dependencies are increasing.

So what else is there and how can it help me to pick up the time-varying dependencies between two time series that accounts for both linear and non-linear relationships? Something like a time-varying Kendall tau or time-varying mutual information would be nice.

## Answer by Malick (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/21894

I think you fail to understand Multivariate Garch model such as DCC models since they do take into account non linearity. They are interested in jointly modeling the time series behavior of multiple conditional variance processes.

Each couple of series has its own particular conditional correlation process evolving trough time in a non-linear way. In fact they are devoted to this understanding of co-movement. I recommend you to have a look to this excellent survey:

> Bauwens, L., Laurent, S., & Rombouts, J. V. K. (2006). Multivariate GARCH models: a survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(1), 79–109. http://doi.org/10.1002/jae.842

ex : the conditional correlation of serie A and B may be modeled as autoregressive process while each of one having its own different conditional variance process. The conditional correlation of serie A and C is a different autoregressive process. Both processes have square terms allowing no-linear relationship. Also, They can have explanatory variable and feedback to the conditional mean process (Arch-in- mean models). Don't see them as simple "Pearson estimator" processes.

However another interesting class of models you can have a look are Unobserved Components Models (which can be estimated via state space models). They are recents and you can model the joint behavior of multiple series. A good starting point is the following book :

> An Introduction to State Space Time Series Analysis by Jacques J.F. Commandeur,Siem Jan Koopman (2007).

Finally, you can also have a look to multivariate stochastic volatility models, which you can also estimate with state space models and kalman filter.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.