Skip to content
All library documents

Modeling Loan Portfolio Losses with a Binomial Default Count

Article Quant Q&A · Author: XY0

Summary

The note addresses how to form a loss distribution for a portfolio of loans when each loan has the same probability of default and each default causes a fixed loss. It recommends modeling the default count with a binomial distribution, using the number of loans and the per-loan default probability as parameters. The loss for each outcome is the number of defaults multiplied by the loss per default, and the corresponding binomial probabilities form the distribution.

The example lists probabilities from zero through several defaults and reports that the probabilities sum to one. It also notes that a Poisson model with the expected default count as its parameter gives nearly the same results in this setting. The table originally supplied with the question contains figures that are inconsistent with the model and should not be combined with calculated probabilities. The approach assumes identical default probabilities and independent defaults; dependence among borrowers or varying exposures would require a richer model.

Key ideas

  • The default count for equal independent loan risks can be modeled with a binomial distribution.
  • Expected defaults equal the number of loans multiplied by the per-loan default probability.
  • Portfolio loss is obtained by multiplying the default count by the loss assigned to each default.
  • A Poisson approximation can give similar probabilities when the default probability is small and the portfolio is large.
  • The model assumes independent defaults and equal loan-level default probabilities.

Tags

Full text
# Probability distribution of portfolio loss


# Probability distribution of portfolio loss












I was trying to do this exercise, and something doesn't quite add up. We need to calculate,with reference to a time horizon of one year the expected number of defaults and the probability of default equal to the expected number of defaults for a portfolio consisting of 200 loans, each with probability of default(PD) equal to 1%. It is suggested that the Poisson distribution be used. This is how I computed the expected number of defaults $E(D) = n\times PD = 200\times0.01 = 2$

Using the poisson I computed the probability of default equal to the expected number of defaults(2) as $P(X=2) = \frac{\lambda^x e^{-\lambda}}{x!}$ = $\frac{2^2 e^{-2}}{2!}$ = 0.27

What is not clear is in the next point: making use of the probability of the previous point and assuming that losses are directly proportional to the number of defaults in the amount of 20000, complete the probability distribution of portfolio loss given below:

\begin{matrix} \textbf{Loss} & \textbf{Probability} \\ 0 & 0.16 \\ 20000 & ? \\ 40000 & ? \\ 60000 & 0.22 \\ 80000 & 0.08 \\ 100000 & 0.02 \\ \end{matrix}

Can someone help me to fill this table?

If the initial value in the table(no default ) is associated with a probability of 0.16% , my answer in the first point could not be right because $P(X=0) \frac{\lambda^x e^{\lambda}}{x!} = e^{-2}= 0.135$

Then the probability of X=1 which is equal to X=2 is $P(X=1) \frac{\lambda^x e^{\lambda}}{x!} = \lambda e^{-2}= 0.27$

If we add these probabilities to those in the table, however, it goes beyond the value 1. How can I tackle this problem?

## Answer by Kurt G. (score 3, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/81235

- Who produced those other probabilities in that table?

- Simplicity is key. Instead of fiddling around with a Poisson distribution we take $X$ to be binomially distributed with parameters $n=200$ and $p=0.01\,.$ This produces the table \begin{align} x && Loss && Prob\\ \hline 0 && 0 && 0.13\\ 1 && 20,000 && 0.27\\ 2 && 40,000 && 0.27\\ 3 && 60,000 && 0.18\\ 4 && 80,000 && 0.09\\ 5 && 100,000 && 0.04\\ 6 && 120,000 && 0.01\\ \hline && Total && 1.00\\ \end{align} where each probability is $P(X=x)={n\choose x}p^x(1-p)^{n-x}\,.$

- If we use instead your method with Poisson, $$P(X=x)=\frac{\lambda^xe^{-\lambda}}{x!}\,,\quad\lambda=2\,,$$ we practically get the same table.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.