Skip to content
All library documents

Numeraire Changes and FX Expectations Under Different Risk-Neutral Measures

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user50123

Summary

The document examines a foreign-exchange spot quoted as dollars per euro and compares expectations under dollar and euro risk-neutral measures. The question derives discounted-price expectation identities using each currency's bank-account numeraire, then multiplies them to obtain a product equal to one. The response presents this product as consistent with the two pricing identities, while emphasizing that the expectations are taken under different measures.

It explains measure changes through a Radon-Nikodym derivative constructed from the two numeraires, showing how a discounted expectation under one measure can be rewritten under the other. The same numeraire approach can extend to forward measures, where a zero-coupon bond serves as numeraire. This is an informal exposition: the response omits technical conditions for the measure change and martingale properties, and its FX numeraire conventions require careful checking. The product identity does not combine the two expectations into one expectation under a shared measure.

Key ideas

  • FX pricing identities use the bank-account numeraire of the relevant currency measure.
  • The two discounted-price expectations are taken under distinct risk-neutral measures.
  • A Radon-Nikodym derivative expresses the change between measures through their numeraires.
  • Changing numeraire rewrites discounted expectations and can help derive asset dynamics under a new measure.
  • Forward measures use zero-coupon bonds as numeraires, subject to consistent conventions and assumptions.

Tags

Full text
# question regarding relation between expectations on different measures


# question regarding relation between expectations on different measures












I am a beginner to the theory of stochastic calculus and measure change. I have derived an equation related to expectations on different measures. I wanted some expert opinion on whether this is true or if I am making a mistake.

Let $X(t) = \frac{USD}{EUR}(t)$ be a FX spot. Let $B^{USD}(t) = e^{\int^t_0 r_{USD}(u) du}$ be the bank account numeraire which gives the USD risk neutral measure. Similarly let $B^{EUR}(t) = e^{\int^t_0 r_{EUR}(u) du}$ be the bank account numeraire which gives the EUR risk neutral measure. Now by arbitrage pricing theorem we have,

$$\frac{X(0)}{B^{USD}(0)} = \mathbb{E}^{Q_{USD}}\big[ \frac{X(T)}{B^{USD}(T)}\big]$$

also considering $1/X(t)$ to be asset we have,

$$\frac{1}{X(0) \cdot B^{EUR}(0)} = \mathbb{E}^{Q_{EUR}}\big[ \frac{1}{X(T) \cdot B^{EUR}(T)}\big]$$

Now since $B^{USD}(0) = B^{EUR}(0) = 1$ we can multiply both the equations to obtain the following

$$1 = \mathbb{E}^{Q_{USD}}\big[ \frac{X(T)}{B^{USD}(T)}\big] \cdot \mathbb{E}^{Q_{EUR}}\big[ \frac{1}{X(T) \cdot B^{EUR}(T)}\big]$$

Is this derivation correct or am I making a mistake? I have not found this in any book, I just derived it myself and since I am beginner I would like some expert opinion on whether this is correct or not.

Thanks a lot in advance.

## Answer by rrnl (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/71229

I think your derivations are correct. The way I look at those problems, is thinking about the numeraire as a discounting asset. Then a measure change can be applied very easily. In this way, you don't have to compare $X(t)$ and $\frac{1}{X(t)}$ with each other under the different measures. For forex this might not be a problem, however, for stock prices the reciprocal interpetation may become difficult.

Let $B_{\text{EUR}}(t)$ be the value process of a risk-free investment in the currency EUR (for instance a bank account in euros), and let $B_{\text{USD}}(t)$ be the process governing the value of a risk-free investment in the USD. Let $X(t)$ be the process governing the FX spot rates. Furthermore, let $\mathbb{Q}_{\text{EUR}}$ be the risk-neutral measure under the risk-free EUR investment, such that the asset $X(t)$ discounted by the risk-free investment $B_{\text{EUR}}(t)$ is a martingale (I skip everything on existence and such). On the other hand, let $\mathbb{Q}_{\text{USD}}$ be the risk-neutral measure with respect to the risk-free investment $B_{\text{USD}}(t)$. Define the reltation $$ \dfrac{\text{d}\mathbb{Q}_{\text{USD}}}{\text{d}\mathbb{Q}_{\text{EUR}}} = \dfrac{B_{\text{USD}}(T) B_\text{EUR}(t)}{B_{\text{USD}}(t)B_\text{EUR}(T)}, $$ for $t < T$.

Let $\mathcal{F}_t$ be the information of the process $X(t)$ up to time $t$. Rewriting the conditional expectation \begin{align} B_\text{EUR}(t) \mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{Q}_\text{EUR}}\left(\left.\dfrac{X(T)}{B_\text{EUR}(T)} \right| \mathcal{F}_t\right) & = B_\text{EUR}(t) \int_{\mathbb{R}} \dfrac{X(T)}{B_\text{EUR}(T)} \text{d}\mathbb{Q}_\text{EUR} \\ & = B_\text{EUR}(t) \int_{\mathbb{R}} \dfrac{X(T)}{B_\text{EUR}(T)} \dfrac{B_{\text{USD}}(t)B_\text{EUR}(T)}{B_{\text{USD}}(T) B_\text{EUR}(t)} \text{d}\mathbb{Q}_{\text{USD}} \\ & = \int_{\mathbb{R}} X(T) \dfrac{B_{\text{USD}}(t)}{B_{\text{USD}}(T)}\text{d}\mathbb{Q}_{\text{USD}} \\ & = B_{\text{USD}}(t) \mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{Q}_\text{USD}}\left(\left. \dfrac{X(T)}{B_\text{USD}(T)}\right| \mathcal{F}_t\right) \end{align} Note that the discounted process under the new measure needs to be a martingale under that new measure, as all discounted assets under the new measure need to be martingales under the new measure. In this way the dynamics of the asset $X(t)$ can be found under the new measure.

This approach can also help you find prices discounted under other measures, such as the $T$-forward measure. The $T$-forward measure is often used when the interest rate is assumed to be stochastic. The discounting asset, or numeraire, under the $T$-forward measure is the zero-coupon bond.

Remark:

$\dfrac{\text{d}\mathbb{Q}_{\text{USD}}}{\text{d}\mathbb{Q}_{\text{EUR}}}$ is called the Radon-Nikodym derivative, I am not an expert on that measure theoretical concept, however, you can find plenty of info about it via googling the subject. For this post, it can be taken for granted. Finding the Radon-Nikodym derivative corresponding to the measure change you want to apply is constructing it in such a way the discount terms of the old measure cancel out.

I hope you find it usefull.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.