Pandemic Risk Hedging with Catastrophe Bonds and Safe-Haven Assets
Summary
The discussion frames pandemics as severe, low-frequency risks that are difficult to estimate from limited historical data. It does not provide a quantitative pricing model or specify model inputs, so it offers no method for estimating pandemic probabilities or losses. Its practical focus is on possible hedges rather than on measuring the risk itself.
One proposed instrument is a catastrophe bond: investors provide capital that may be used by the issuer after a trigger defined in the bond terms, with investors potentially losing some or all of their principal. If the trigger is not met, investors receive principal and interest. For a conventional investor, the answer suggests treating a pandemic-related market shock like a financial crisis and holding high-quality government bonds alongside equities, based on the possibility that risk-off demand may support government bond prices as equities fall. These are general examples, not tested recommendations; the discussion does not assess basis risk, trigger design, bond pricing, or whether government bonds would provide a reliable hedge in a particular pandemic.
Key ideas
- Catastrophe bonds can transfer specified disaster losses to investors in exchange for interest and contingent principal risk.
- A catastrophe bond’s payout depends on the trigger and terms set in its documentation.
- An investor might hedge crisis exposure with high-quality government bonds that could benefit from risk-off demand.
- The discussion gives no quantitative model, evidence, or proof that these hedges will work in a pandemic.
Tags
Full text
# How to model/price the risk of Covid-19 and other pandemics # How to model/price the risk of Covid-19 and other pandemics How would you model and price the risk of Covid-19 pandemic? These large cost low probability events with very little history seems to pose a particular challenge when quantitatively modeling and pricing the risk. What types of models have you used? What are the inputs to your models? Taleb is calling this a White Swan--a predictable event. How should one hedge this risk? What type of tail risk mitigation steps/programs should one use? What type of options strategies would be most effective and could one use? ## Answer by Martin Vesely (score 2) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/53375 Concerning the hedging, you can use so-called catastrophe bonds. They are often issued by insurers and reinsurers, development banks and I can imagine issue by a pharma company. Funds raised from these bonds are put on separated account where they waint until a catastrophe (specified in the bond documentation) occurs. When this happens, the issuer can use funds on the account to treat consequences of the catastrophe. Sometimes there is a provision that in case of the catastrophe, the issuer will return no or smaller nominal to an investor. In case the catastrophe does not occur, the issuer returns whole nominal plus interest to the investor. If we look at a normal investor (e.g. central bank, mutual fund etc.), a pandemic is very similar to any financial crisis. So an approach to hedging depends on how much risk-averse the investor is. You can for example use negative correlation between high quality government bonds and equities - when a financial crisis break out, equities would lose but there would be risk-off behavior and fly to government bonds whose price would increase.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.