Skip to content
All library documents

Pricing a Barrier Exchange Option Without a Distribution Model

Article Quant Q&A · Author: meg1806

Summary

The document considers an option that pays the difference between two stock prices at maturity only if the first stock stays above the second throughout the option’s life. It presents a model-free replication argument: hold one share of the first stock and short one share of the second, closing the position if their prices meet. Since both the option and this strategy are then worth zero at the crossing, the proposed initial value is the difference between the two starting prices.

A second derivation changes to a probability measure associated with the second stock, under which the price ratio is a martingale. With continuous price paths, stopping that ratio when it reaches one gives the same value by the optional stopping argument. The argument depends on assumptions such as tradability, self-financing hedging, and continuous paths; jumps could carry the ratio below the barrier without hitting it. A barrier-option formula is also discussed, but it requires an additional lognormal assumption and is not needed for the continuous-path martingale argument.

Key ideas

  • A long position in one stock and a short position in another can replicate the stated payoff if it is closed when their prices meet.
  • Under a measure associated with the second stock, the price ratio is a martingale.
  • For continuous paths, stopping the ratio at the barrier or maturity supports the model-independent valuation argument.
  • A lognormal barrier-option formula is an alternative that introduces a distribution assumption.
  • Jumps and practical limits on dynamic trading can invalidate the simple replication argument.

Tags

Full text
# How to price a path dependent exchange option using?


# How to price a path dependent exchange option using?












Assume you have two stocks $S$ and $P$ so that at initial time $t = 0$: $S_0 > P_0$.

You bought an option which pays off $S_T - P_T$ as long as $S_t > P_t$ through the time $0 < t < T$.

What would the price of such option be?

*I am looking for a non-arbitrage argument avoiding any specific distribution assumptions (log-normal, normal etc) if possible.

## Answer by meg1806 (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/21867

I solved it the following way, just want make sure I'm not missing something obvious.

Set up a portfolio $PF$ consisting of long $S$ and short $P$ at time $t = 0$. Choose arbitrary time $0 < t < T$. If $S_t > P_t$ then $PF_t = S_t - P_t$ which coincides with the value of the option. If $S_t$ hits $P_t$ from above, then dissolve the portfolio by selling $S$ and buying $P$. Again both the portfolio $PF$ and the option have the same value 0 in this case.

So we have a self-financing portfolio which has the same payoff at time $T$ as the option. So the option value at $t=0$ must be the same as the portfolio value in the absence of arbitrage, i.e. option value is $S_0 - P_0$.

## Answer by Gordon (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/21854

The option payoff at maturity $T$ is defined by \begin{align*} (S_T-P_T)1_{\left(\inf_{0 \le t <T}\frac{S_t}{P_t}\right) > 1}. \end{align*} Let $Q$ be the risk-neutral probability measure and $E$ be the corresponding expectation operator. Let $Q_p$ be a probability measure defined by \begin{align*} \frac{dQ_p}{dQ}\big|_t = \frac{P_t}{e^{rt} P_0}. \end{align*} Moreover, let $E_p$ be the corresponding expectation operator. Then the option value can be computed by \begin{align*} e^{-rT}E\left((S_T-P_T)1_{\left(\inf_{0 \le t <T}\frac{S_t}{P_t}\right) > 1} \right) &= e^{-rT}E_p\left(\left(\frac{dQ_p}{dQ}\big|_T\right)^{-1}(S_T-P_T)1_{\left(\inf_{0 \le t <T}\frac{S_t}{P_t}\right) > 1} \right)\\ &=P_0 E_p\left(\left(\frac{S_T}{P_T}-1\right)1_{\left(\inf_{0 \le t <T}\frac{S_t}{P_t}\right) > 1} \right), \end{align*} which can be treated as a down-and-out barrier call option, assuming that $S_t/P_t$ is log-normally distributed under the measure $Q_p$.

Note that, under $Q_p$, the process $\{S_t/P_t \mid t \geq 0\}$ is a martingale, that is, we can treat $S_t/P_t$ as an asset process with zero interest and zero dividend. Using the down-and-out barrier call option formula in John Hull, we obtain that \begin{align*} E_p\left(\left(\frac{S_T}{P_T}-1\right)1_{\left(\inf_{0 \le t <T}\frac{S_t}{P_t}\right) > 1} \right) = \frac{S_0}{P_0}-1. \end{align*} That is, the option price is $S_0-P_0$.

## Answer by Antoine Conze (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/21892

The option payoff is equivalent to $Z_{\tau \wedge T}-1$ where $\tau=\inf\{t | Z_t = 1\}$ provided that $Z_t$ is assumed to be continuous. Since $Z_t=S_t/P_t$ is a martingale under $Q_P$, we have $E_P[Z_{\tau \wedge T}]=Z_0$ and the option value is $P_0 (Z_0 - 1)=S_0-P_0$ regardless of the model.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.