Pricing a Cubic Payoff on a Weighted Log-Price Average
Summary
The document derives a risk-neutral price for a payoff equal to the cube of a time-weighted integral of log stock prices in a zero-rate Black–Scholes model. Under the risk-neutral measure, the log price is a Brownian process with drift equal to minus one half of the variance rate. Integrating it with the exponential time weight yields a normally distributed quantity: its mean comes from the deterministic terms, while stochastic Fubini rewrites its random part as a Brownian integral with a time-dependent kernel. The variance follows by integrating the squared kernel, scaled by the volatility variance rate.
The third moment of a normal variable then gives the expected payoff as the cube of the mean plus three times the mean times the variance. This provides the valuation once the mean and variance integrals are evaluated. The document’s moment-generating-function expressions appear to mix variance and standard-deviation notation: read consistently, the variance parameter is used directly in the third-moment formula. The derivation also assumes the stated model and payoff, with no discussion of numerical implementation or nonzero interest rates.
Key ideas
- Under the risk-neutral measure, the log stock price has drift minus one half of the variance rate in this zero-rate model.
- The weighted integral of log prices is normally distributed because its random component is a deterministic Brownian integral.
- Stochastic Fubini expresses the random component using a kernel that depends on the remaining time to maturity.
- The payoff expectation is obtained from the third moment, which depends on the normal variable’s mean and variance.
- The source’s moment-generating-function notation is inconsistent about whether its variance symbol is squared.
Tags
Full text
# Pricing a contract
# Pricing a contract
I'm currently trying to price some different kinds of contracts. I'm stuck on this following exercise, which I can't seems to find a good solution for. The following is assumed:
- We are in a standard BS environment with $dS(t) = \mu S(t) dt + \sigma S(t) dW(t)$ with $\mu, \sigma > 0$.
- Interest rate is $0$.
- The $Q$ dynamics are: $dS(t) = \sigma S(t) dW(t)^{Q}$.
- The payoff function is given as: $\left(\int_{0}^{T} \mathrm{e}^{a \cdot v}\ln(S(v))dv\right)^3$.
### The task is to find the risk neutral valuation.
My approach was to start write the RNV function in our case, which is $$F(t,S(t))=\mathrm{e}^{-r(T-t)}E^{Q}[payoff] = E^{Q}\left[\left(\int_{0}^{T} \mathrm{e}^{a \cdot v}\ln(S(v))dv\right)^3\right]$$
Define $X(t) = ln(S(t))$, then applying Ito, we get $$\begin{align} dX(t) = \frac{1}{S(t)}dS(t) - \frac{1}{2S(t)^{2}}(dS(t))^2 &= \frac{1}{S(t)}(\sigma S(t) dW(t)^Q) - \frac{1}{2S(t)^{2}}(\sigma S(t) dW(t)^Q)^2\\ &= -\frac{1}{2}\sigma^{2}dt+\sigma dW(t)^{Q}\end{align}$$ Define now $Y(t) = \mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t}X(t)$. Applying Ito, we get $$\begin{align} dY(t) &= a\mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t}X(t)dt+\mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t}d(X(t)) =aY(t)dt+\mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t}(-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^{2}dt+\sigma dW(t)^{Q})\\ &=aY(t)dt-\mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t}\frac{1}{2}\sigma^{2}dt+\mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t}\sigma dW(t)^{Q} \end{align}$$ Integrating both sides we get $$ \begin{align} Y(T) &= Y(t) + (Z(T) - Z(t))-\mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t}\frac{1}{2a}\sigma^{2} + \sigma^{2}\int_{t}^{T} \mathrm{e}^{a \cdot t} dv \end{align} $$ where $Z(t) = \int_{0}^{t} Y(v) dv$.
This is where I'm not sure where to proceed or if my calculations up until now are correct.
## Answer by Daneel Olivaw (score 4, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/69102
The proof strategy consists on showing the quantity of interest is normally-distributed, then using the moment-generating function of a normal variable to obtain its third moment.
Under measure $\mathcal{Q}$, we define \begin{align} \xi:&=\int_0^Te^{av}\ln S_v \text{d}v \\ &=\int_0^Te^{av}\left(\ln S_0-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2v+\sigma W_v^\mathcal{Q}\right)\text{d}v. \end{align}
The mean $\mu$ of $\xi$ is equal to $$\mu:=\int_0^Te^{av}\left(\ln S_0-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2v\right)\text{d}v.$$
Then $$\xi=\mu+\sigma\int_0^Te^{av}W_v^\mathcal{Q}\text{d}v,$$
Now per the stochastic Fubini theorem: \begin{align} \int_0^Te^{av}W_v^\mathcal{Q}\text{d}v &=\int_0^Te^{av}\left(\int_0^T1_{\{u\leq v\}}\text{d}W_u^\mathcal{Q}\right)\text{d}v \\ &=\int_0^T\left(\int_0^Te^{av}1_{\{u\leq v\}}\text{d}v\right)\text{d}W_u^\mathcal{Q} \\ &=\int_0^T\left(\int_u^Te^{av}\text{d}v\right)\text{d}W_u^\mathcal{Q} \\ &=\int_0^T\theta(u,T)\text{d}W_u^\mathcal{Q}, \end{align} where $$\theta(u,T):=\frac{e^{aT}-e^{au}}{a}$$
Yet we know that the stochastic integral above follows a Gaussian distribution, so $$\xi\overset{\mathcal{L}}{=}X,$$
where $$X\sim\mathcal{N}\left(\mu,\nu\right)$$ and $$\nu:=\sigma^2\int_0^T\theta(u,T)^2\text{d}u.$$ The moment-generating function $M(t)$ of a Gaussian random variable with mean $\mu$ and variance $\nu$ is $$M(t):=e^{\mu t+\frac{1}{2}\nu^2t^2}.$$ Differentiating 3 times: $$M^{\prime\prime\prime}(t):=\left(3\nu^2(\mu+\nu^2t)+(\mu+\nu^2t)^3\right)M(t).$$ Setting $t=0$ gives us the desired result: \begin{align} E(\xi^3) &= M^{\prime\prime\prime}(0) \\ &=3\nu^2\mu+\mu^3. \end{align}Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.