Skip to content
All library documents

Pricing a Default-Contingent Payment from Default Intensity

Article Quant Q&A · Author: cp123456

Summary

The document considers a claim that pays one unit if default occurs before maturity and seeks to express its value as an integral over possible default times. The proposed representation combines the default-time density, formed from the hazard rate and survival probability, with discounting by the risk-free rate. Integrating these contributions over the life of the claim gives the expected discounted payment.

The answer explains the integral through conditioning on each possible default time, but its derivation is informal and its assumptions need care. It treats rates and intensity as independent and at one point effectively deterministic, while the displayed target retains an expectation. In a stochastic setting, the price generally requires an expectation of the joint discounted default density, accounting for dependence between rates, intensity, and default. The note gives a useful intuition for intensity-based credit pricing, but not a fully general derivation.

Key ideas

  • A payment made only upon default can be valued by summing discounted contributions across possible default times.
  • The default-time density is the hazard rate multiplied by the probability of surviving to that time.
  • Discounting and default probability combine inside an integral over the period before maturity.
  • The derivation depends on assumptions about whether rates and default intensity are deterministic or stochastic and how they depend on each other.
  • The answer's independence argument does not establish the general stochastic case.

Tags

Full text
# Fixed Payment at Default - Pricing


# Fixed Payment at Default - Pricing












Let us consider a product paying an amount of 1 if default (τ<T that is the time of default arrives before maturity time), and 0 otherwise.

The payoff of such a product would be given by:

$$D(0, T) = E\left(\exp\left(-\int_0^\tau r(t)dt\right) \cdot \mathbb{1}_{\tau \leq T}\right)$$

Knowing that:

$$\text{Probability}(T \leq \tau \leq T + dT) = \lambda(T) \cdot \exp\left(-\int_0^{T} \lambda(t) dt\right) \cdot dT$$

Could someone explain how it is possible to arrive to: $$D(0,T) = E\left(\int_0^T \lambda(t) \cdot \exp\left(-\int_0^t (r(s) + \lambda(s)) ds\right) dt\right)$$

I tried to use the law of iterated expectation but struggled to find a way out.

## Answer by TourEiffel (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/75645

The quantity you're trying to derive is the price at time 0 of a defaultable zero coupon bond which pays off 1 if default occurs before the maturity time T (i.e., τ<T), and 0 otherwise.

This is a bit tricky but the key here is to understand that we can represent this price as an integral over the possible default times. The intuition is that you're integrating the payoffs across all possible times of default.

Since default could happen at any time t in [0, T], we write D(0,T) as an integral from 0 to T.

At any given time t, the payoff is the present value of 1 discounted back to time 0 if default occurs, weighted by the probability that default occurs at that time. The discounting term is $$\exp\left(-\int_{0}^{t} r(s)ds\right)$$ , and from your given information, the default probability density function is $$\lambda(t) \cdot \exp\left(-\int_{0}^{t} \lambda(s)ds\right) $$.

Therefore, we can write D(0,T) as:

$$ D(0,T) = \int_{0}^{T} E[ \exp(-\int_{0}^{t}r(s)ds) \cdot \lambda(t) \cdot \exp(-\int_{0}^{t}\lambda(s)ds) \mid \mathcal{F}_t ] dt $$

Note that we're using the filtration F_t as it would represent the information available at time t, which would contain both r(s) and λ(s) for all s≤t.

Since r and λ are assumed to be independent, we can treat r as deterministic when taking the conditional expectation: $$ D(0,T) = \int_{0}^{T} \exp(-\int_{0}^{t}r(s)ds) \cdot E[ \lambda(t) \cdot \exp(-\int_{0}^{t}\lambda(s)ds) \mid \mathcal{F}_t ] dt $$

Which simplifies to: $$ D(0,T) = \int_{0}^{T} \lambda(t) \cdot \exp(-\int_{0}^{t} (r(s) + \lambda(s)) ds) dt $$ In this last expression, the $$\lambda(t) \cdot \exp\left(-\int_{0}^{t} \lambda(s)ds\right)$$ term represents the probability of default at time t and $$\exp\left(-\int_{0}^{t} r(s)ds\right) $$ is the discount factor. We integrate this product over [0, T] to get the expected discounted payoff of the bond.

It's important to remember that the law of iterated expectations and the assumptions of independence between certain variables are key to simplifying these kind of expressions in the credit risk context.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.