Pricing a Deferred Stock-Ratio Claim with a Zero-Coupon Bond
Summary
The document prices a claim that pays the ratio of a non-dividend-paying stock’s value at a later date to its value at an earlier date. Assuming no arbitrage, continuous trading, borrowing and lending at the risk-free rate, and that the claim can be replicated, its value today equals the price of a zero-coupon bond maturing at the earlier date. The rate may vary over time, and the stock’s specific dynamics do not affect this result.
The replication argument is to wait until the earlier date, then invest one unit of cash in the stock. That buys the quantity of shares needed to deliver the specified ratio at the later date. A conditional-expectation derivation reaches the same result: under the risk-neutral measure, the discounted stock price after the earlier date has conditional expectation equal to its value at that date. The conclusion depends on the claim being attainable and the stated idealized market assumptions; transaction costs, trading constraints, dividends, or other departures could change the replication or pricing argument.
Key ideas
- The claim can be replicated by investing one unit of cash in the stock at the earlier date.
- Its value today is the present value of one unit of cash delivered at that earlier date.
- The result holds for variable interest rates and does not require a specific stock-price process.
- The argument assumes a tradable stock, no dividends, and an idealized market with no arbitrage or transaction costs.
Tags
Full text
# Calculate $E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_{0}^{T_2}r_t\,dt} \frac{S\left(T_2\right)}{S\left(T_1\right)}\right]$
# Calculate $E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_{0}^{T_2}r_t\,dt} \frac{S\left(T_2\right)}{S\left(T_1\right)}\right]$
Let $S\left(t\right)$ be a tradable financial security that doesn't generate cash flow (eg no dividend). $S\left(t\right)$ follows an unknown stochastic process.
We now have a financial derivative that pays $\frac{S\left(T_2\right)} {S\left(T_1\right)}$ at $t=T_2$, where $0<T_1<T_2$
Assume interest rate $r_t$ is not constant.
What's the present value of this financial derivative at $t=0$ ?
My attempt so far:
$V\left(0\right)=E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_{0}^{T_2}r_t\,dt} \frac{S\left(T_2\right)}{S\left(T_1\right)}\right]$
I believe my next step should be to get rid of the discount factor term. Any idea how can I do that?
## Answer by Daneel Olivaw (score 4, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/35225
We assume a Black-Scholes world except the dynamics of the stock price, namely:
- No arbitrage opportunities.
- No dividend payments from the stock.
- Existence of a riskless asset yielding the risk free rate $-$ which here we assume non-constant, $(r_t)_{t \geq 0}$.
- Possibility to borrow and lend infinitely at the risk-free rate.
- Possibility to buy and sell infinitely the stock $-$ even fractional amounts.
- No transaction costs.
We also assume that the stock is tradable and that the derivative is attainable $-$ we basically assume we are in the standard pricing setting except for the stock price dynamics.
Then the price at time $t=0$, $V(0)$, of the derivative is given by:
$$ V(0) = P(0,T_1)$$
where $P(0,T_1)$ is the price of a riskless zero-coupon contracted at time $t=0$ and maturing at time $t=T_1$ $-$ which is effectively a function of the rate $r_t$ and is independent of $S(t)$.
Financial proof: the financial derivative you describe delivers a quantity $w$ of the stock at time $T_2$, where:
$$ w = \frac{1}{S(T_1)}$$
Thus $w$ will only be known at time $T_1$, when you will buy $w$ shares of the stock. But at that time, the value of such a position is trivially equal to $\$1$. Thus you only need to have $\$1$ at time $T_1$ to settle the trade at maturity $T_2$; no further transactions are needed. The value today of $\$1$ at $T_1$ is simply equal to the value of a zero-coupon bond contracted at $t=0$ and maturing at $T_1$. Hence:
$$ V(0) = P(0,T_1)$$
Mathematical proof: under the assumptions listed at the beginning, by the law of iterated expectations, adaptedness of the stock price with respect to a suitable filtration $(\mathcal{F})_{t \geq 0}$ and the martingality property of discounted stock prices under the risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}$, we obtain:
$$ \begin{align} V(0) & = E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_0^{T_2}r_t\,dt} \frac{S(T_2)}{S(T_1)}\right] \\[6pt] & = E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_0^{T_2}r_t\,dt} \frac{S(T_2)}{S(T_1)}|\mathcal{F}_{T_1}\right]\right] \\[6pt] & = E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_0^{T_1}r_t\,dt}\frac{1}{S(T_1)}E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_{T_1}^{T_2}r_t\,dt} S(T_2)|\mathcal{F}_{T_1}\right]\right] \\[6pt] & = E^{\mathbb{Q}}\left[e^{-\int_0^{T_1}r_t\,dt}\frac{1}{S(T_1)}S(T_1)\right] \\[9pt] & = P(0,T_1) \end{align} $$
## Answer by dm63 (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/35246
An alternative proof: The contract may be replicated by waiting until $T_1$ and then investing one dollar in the stock. Hence its value must be the same as a zero coupon bond priced at t maturing at $T_1$.
The above holds for any stock dynamics and rate dynamics.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.