Pricing a Piecewise Call Payoff with Standard Options
Summary
The document explains how a modified European call payoff can be priced by decomposing its terminal payoff into standard calls and digital calls. Because option values are linear in the payoff under risk-neutral valuation, the modified contract’s value is the corresponding weighted sum of Black–Scholes prices. A second explanation uses the no-arbitrage idea that piecewise-linear payoffs can be replicated: digital options represent jumps in payoff, while calls represent changes in slope. A further response outlines a risk-neutral expectation approach using event regions and probabilities under stock and money-market numeraires.
These methods provide alternatives to solving the Black–Scholes partial differential equation directly and show how payoff shape determines the replicating portfolio. The document does not establish real-world applications for the modified contract, despite that being part of the original question. Its pricing discussion is tied to Black–Scholes assumptions and the presented payoff decomposition; practical valuation would also depend on market inputs, contract terms, and whether the replication instruments are available and tradable.
Key ideas
- A piecewise-linear option payoff can be represented using calls and digital options.
- Digital options can account for jumps in the payoff, while calls account for changes in slope.
- Linearity of risk-neutral valuation makes the modified option price a weighted sum of component prices.
- The decomposition provides a no-arbitrage alternative to solving the pricing equation directly.
- The Black–Scholes result depends on the model assumptions and the accuracy of the payoff representation.
Tags
Full text
# Analytical soluton to the Black-Scholes equation with a modified European Call Option
# Analytical soluton to the Black-Scholes equation with a modified European Call Option
Please consider the following modified European Call Option
where $ 0 < a \leq 1$. When $a = 1$ the modified European call option is reduced to the standard European call option.
Transforming the Black-Scholes equation in the standard heat equation and using Fourier transform, I am obtaining the following analytical solution for such modified European call option (please do right click on the image to enlarge it)
When $a=1$ the standard Black-Scholes formula for the usual European call option is recovered, namely
My questions are:
- Do you know another method to derive the solution for the modified European Cal option.
- Do you know real life cases on which a modified European Call options are applied.
## Answer by Mark Joshi (score 4)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/19386
When a pay-off is piecewise linear plus jumps, it the same as the portfolio of calls and digital calls. Its price must agree with that of the portfolio by no arbitrage. Every time there is a jump we add in a digital call and every time there is a change in gradient we add in calls equal to the gradient change.
Here we have a call struck at $K$. Just below $2K$ the option pays $K$ and above it pays $a K.$ We have $(a-1)$ digital calls struck at $aK$ and $(a-1)$ calls as well to get the gradient to change to $a.$
Just add the BS formulas for the three contracts to get the price in the BS model.
## Answer by Brian B (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/19382
Using the usual arbitrage arguments, we can write option prices as discounted expectations of future values under risk-neutral probabilities. That is $$ V(S,0) = B(0,T) E\left[ V(S,T) \right] $$
Start by re-writing your particular payoff as the following sum $$ C_K+aC_{2K}+KD_K $$ where $C_x$ is a call struck at $x$ and $D_x$ is a digital option struck at $x$.
Since expectation is a linear operator (i.e. $E[aX+bY] = aE[X]+bE[Y]$) we can then write the value of your option using the standard Black-Scholes formulas $BS_{Call}(\cdot)$ and $Digital_{Call}(\cdot)$ as
$$ V(S,0) = BS_{Call}(K) + a\,BS_{Call}(2K) + K\,Digital_{Call}(K) $$
More generally, $any$ non-pathological terminal payoff $P(S_T)$ can be written in terms of a (finite or converging infinite) sum of standard calls and puts, or of digital calls and puts.
Linearity of the expectation operator then tells us that the present value $V(S_0)$ of that payoff is also a converging infinite sum.
From a measure theory point of view, this happens because linear functions (and step functions) provide a basis for the space of (nonpathological) payoff functions.
## Answer by zsljulius (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/21145
I will try to derive from the scratch as follows: Define the three indicator random variables for the three events: $1_A$ equals 1 if the event ${2K<S_T}$ happens,$1_B$ equals 1 if the event ${K\leq S_T \leq 2K}$, and $1_C$ as the indicator for any other events.
If there exists a stochastic discount factor $M_t$ that prices both the stock and bond, then we have
$\begin{align} p_t &= E_t[M_T\{a(S_T-K) \cdot 1_A+(S_T-K) \cdot 1_B\}] \\ &= aE_t[M_TS_T1_A]-aE_t[M_TK1_A]+ E_t[M_TS_T1_B]-E_t[M_TK1_B]\\ &=a(Prob^s(A)-Prob^R(A)) + Prob^s(B)-Prob^R(B) \end{align}$
Where $Prob^S$ and $Prob^R$ are the probability of these events under the measures with numeriare of the stock (assuming non-dividend-paying) and the money market account respectively. These probability are pretty easy to calculate.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.