Skip to content
All library documents

Pricing a Power-Stock Claim with a Trigger Condition

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user2521987

Summary

The document examines the valuation of a payoff involving a power of the stock price and a threshold event. The response assumes a geometric Brownian motion with constant drift and volatility, transforms the underlying to a new variable equal to the stock price raised to a power, and derives that variable’s effective drift and volatility. It then rewrites the trigger in terms of the transformed variable and expresses the expected payoff using normal distribution probabilities.

This addresses the concern that the trigger should be transformed along with the underlying: for a positive power, a stock threshold can be expressed as an equivalent threshold on the powered stock. However, the question also raises time-varying volatility, while the answer explicitly works under constant volatility and supplies parameter values on that basis. Its formula therefore does not establish a valuation for the time-varying case, and the excerpt provides no numerical option value or independent validation.

Key ideas

  • A powered stock price remains lognormal when the original stock follows geometric Brownian motion with constant volatility.
  • The power transformation changes the effective drift and scales volatility by the power exponent.
  • A threshold on the stock price can be rewritten as a corresponding threshold on the powered stock.
  • The expected trigger payoff can be expressed using normal distribution probabilities.
  • The response assumes constant volatility and does not resolve the question’s time-varying volatility concern.

Tags

Full text
# Valuing a claim on $S^a$: This exercise/solution appears to have a mistake


# Valuing a claim on $S^a$: This exercise/solution appears to have a mistake












The below exercise and solution was found in "Models for Financial Economics" by Abraham Weishaus. My issues are:

- In this problem, $S(t)$ does not satisfy the Black-Scholes framework because volatility is time-varying. According to this paper on page 15, it would appear that we would need to modify the volatility of $S(t)$ for use in the Black-Scholes formula such that:

$$\text{Var}\left(\ln S(t) | S(0)\right) = \frac{1}{1 - 0}\int_0^1 (\sigma(t))^2 dt = \frac{1}{1 - 0}\int_0^1 (0.16t)^2 dt = 0.00853333.$$

- The second issue is that this appears, based on the wording, to be a gap option where the trigger is $S(1) > 60$ and not $S(1)^{0.9} > 60$.

The author mentions in the errata that the $r$ in the fourth expression from the top of the solution should be changed in the exponent to $\alpha$, but does not address these other concerns.

Are these concerns justified, or is the author's solution correct?

## Answer by Gordon (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/31734

Under the Black-Scholes' framework, the underlying stock price price process $\{S_t, \, t\ge 0\}$ satisfies an SDE of the from $$ dS_t = S_t (\alpha dt + \sigma dW_t),$$ where $\{W_t, \, t\ge 0\}$ is a standard Brownian motion, $\alpha$ is the continuously compounded stock return, and $\sigma$ is the constant volatility. Then $$S_t = S_0e^{(\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)t + \sigma W_t}.$$ Consequently, $$\ln S_t = \ln S_0 + \big(\alpha-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2\big)t + \sigma W_t,$$ and $$\text{Var}( \ln S_t \mid S_0) = \sigma^2 t.$$ From the given information, $\alpha=0.15$, $\sigma = 0.4$.

Let $X_t = S_t^a$. Note that \begin{align*} X_t &= X_0e^{(a\alpha-\frac{1}{2}a\sigma^2)t + a\sigma W_t}\\ &=X_0e^{(a\alpha + \frac{1}{2}a(a-1)\sigma^2-\frac{1}{2}a^2\sigma^2)t + a\sigma W_t}\\ &\equiv X_0e^{(\mu-\frac{1}{2}a^2\sigma^2)t + a\sigma W_t}. \end{align*} Here, \begin{align*} \mu = a\alpha + \frac{1}{2}a(a-1)\sigma^2 = 0.1287. \end{align*}

The option payoff is given by \begin{align*} (S_1^a - 30) 1_{S_1 > 60} &= (S_1^a - 30) 1_{S_1^a > 60^a}\\ &= (X_1 - 30) 1_{X_1 > 60^a}\\ &=X_1\, 1_{X_1 > 60^a} - 30\, 1_{X_1 > 60^a}. \end{align*} Therfore, the expected payoff is given by \begin{align*} E(X_1) N(d_1) - 30 N(d_2), \end{align*} where \begin{align*} d_1 = \frac{\ln (X_0 / 60^a) + \mu + \frac{1}{2}a^2 \sigma^2}{a\sigma}, \end{align*} and \begin{align*} d_2 = d_1 - a\sigma. \end{align*}

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.