Skip to content
All library documents

Pricing a Two-Date Asset-or-Nothing Binary Option

Article Quant Q&A · Author: vicky113

Summary

The document treats an expectation involving an indicator at an intermediate date and a Black–Scholes probability term as a two-date binary option. The payoff requires the underlying asset to exceed one threshold at the first date and another at the later date. Under the stated Black–Scholes assumptions, its value can be written using a bivariate standard normal distribution function, with the correlation determined by the two time horizons and the signs of the threshold conditions.

The expression includes discounting to the later payoff date. The answer identifies the contract as a special case of multi-period binary options and points to published derivations. The result relies on the model assumptions behind Black–Scholes, including its volatility and rate setup; the document does not address adjustments for dividends, stochastic volatility, or other market dynamics.

Key ideas

  • The expectation corresponds to a binary payoff with threshold conditions at two different dates.
  • The intermediate-date indicator and later-date binary probability are jointly dependent through the asset price path.
  • Under the stated model, the price is expressed with a bivariate normal cumulative distribution function.
  • The correlation parameter reflects the relationship between the two time horizons.
  • Discounting is required to value the later-date payoff at an earlier time.

Tags

Full text
# Expectation of N(d2)?


# Expectation of N(d2)?












I am trying to find out the Pricing Equation for certain type of Options under Risk-Neutral pricing. This is the equation I am getting, but I am not sure if this can be solved or not. Any help is appreciated.

$$V = E[I\{S(T_0) \geq B\}N(d_2)]$$

$t_0 < T_0 < T_1$ This is a time line

$$I\{S(T_0) \geq B\} = \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if } S(T_0) \geq B \\ 0, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$

where $S(t_0), S(T_0)$ is the stock price at different times.

$N(d_2)$ is the Black Scholes $N(d_2)$ but Stock Price used in $N(d_2)$ is $S(T_0)$, and time period is $T_1-T_0$. So $N(d_2)$ in itself is a Random Variable in this case.

I am trying to find the Expectation at time $= t_0$

$ d_2 = [ln(S(T_0)/K)+(r-0.5vol^2)(T_1-T_0)] / (vol* sqrt (T_1-T_0)) $

$ S(T_0) = S(t_0) exp((r-0.5vol^2)(T_0-t_0) + vol * sqrt(T_0-t_0)Z) $

Z~N(0,1)

## Answer by LocalVolatility (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/33730

You are essentially interested in pricing a second order bond-binary option. In its most general form, this contract has a time $T_2$ payoff of

\begin{equation} \mathcal{B}_{\xi_1, \xi_2}^{s_1, s_2} \left( S_{T_1}, S_{T_2}, T_2 \right) = \mathrm{1} \left\{ s_1 S_{T_1} > s_1 \xi_1 \right\} \mathrm{1} \left\{ s_2 S_{T_2} > s_2 \xi_2 \right\}. \end{equation}

In your case, we have $\xi_1 = B$, $s_1 = +1$, $\xi_2 = K$ and $s_2 = +1$. The time $T_1$ value of this option is equal to

\begin{equation} \mathcal{B}_{\xi_1, \xi_2}^{s_1, s_2} \left( S_{T_1}, T_1 \right) = \mathrm{1} \left\{ s_1 S_{T_1} > s_1 \xi_1 \right\} e^{-r \left( T_2 - T_1 \right)} \mathbb{E} \left[ \left. \mathrm{1} \left\{ s_2 S_{T_2} > s_2 \xi_2 \right\} \right| S_{T_1} \right]. \end{equation}

Apart from the additional discounting, this is the same expression as in your question.

This contract is a special case of the generalize multi-period and multi-asset $\mathbb{M}$-binary options analyzed by Skipper and Buchen (2003). Its time $0 \leq t < T_1$ value is given by

\begin{equation} \mathcal{B}_{\xi_1, \xi_2}^{s_1, s_2} \left( S_t, t \right) = e^{-r \tau_2} \mathcal{N}_2 \left( \alpha_{0, 1}, \alpha_{0, 2}; \rho \right), \end{equation}

where $\tau_i = T_i - t$,

\begin{equation} \alpha_{0, i} = \frac{s_i}{\sigma \sqrt{\tau_i}} \left( \ln \left( \frac{S}{\xi_i} \right) + \left( r - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) \tau_i \right) \end{equation}

and

\begin{equation} \rho = s_1 s_2 \sqrt{\frac{\tau_1}{\tau_2}}. \end{equation}

Here, $\mathcal{N}_2$ is the bivariate standard normal distribution function with the given correlation. See the original paper for a derivation of this result. You find a similar result in Chapter 2 of the Ph.D. thesis Veiga (2010). See also this related question and the corresponding answers.

References

Skipper, Max and Peter W. Buchen (2003) "The Quintessiential Option Pricing Formula", Working Paper, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, available online

Veiga, Carlos Manuel "Closed Formulas and Rating Schemes for Derivatives", Ph.D. Thesis, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, available online

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.