Pricing European, American, and Perpetual Derivatives
Summary
The document outlines pricing approaches for derivatives with general payoff functions under European, American, and perpetual exercise rules. For European claims, it gives the risk-neutral discounted expected payoff and explains that a specified underlying model can yield a closed-form value or a simulation estimate. It also presents a spanning approach that represents suitable payoffs using vanilla calls and puts, and illustrates the idea with a log payoff. Vanilla option prices can therefore support model-light valuation of many integrable payoffs, subject to available strike coverage and regularity assumptions.
American claims require optimizing over exercise times, so the answer describes the problem as an optimal stopping expectation and points to numerical methods and early-exercise analysis. For perpetual claims under geometric Brownian motion, it frames valuation through a constant exercise threshold and the discounted probability of reaching it. The discussion is a broad overview rather than a complete derivation: results depend on the payoff, rates, exercise convention, underlying dynamics, and assumptions such as zero dividends. It does not provide a universal replication strategy for every payoff.
Key ideas
- European derivative values can be expressed as discounted risk-neutral expected payoffs.
- Suitable European payoffs can be represented using vanilla option prices across strikes.
- American derivative valuation requires choosing an optimal exercise time and often needs numerical methods.
- Perpetual options can be analyzed through an exercise threshold and the discounted first-passage time to that threshold.
- Greeks and closed-form solutions depend on the payoff shape and the assumed underlying price model.
Tags
Full text
# Pricing various classes of derivatives and replicating them
# Pricing various classes of derivatives and replicating them
Consider the following three derivative styles and assume zero dividends for simplicity.
The "american style", "european style", and "infinite" style:
$$L_{A}(S,K,t,T)=f(K,S)\cdot I(t\leq T)$$
$$L_{E}(S,K,t,T)=f(K,S)\cdot I(t=T)$$
$$L_{\infty}(S,K,t,T)=f(K,S)\quad(\text{as in }L_A\text{ with }T\rightarrow \infty)$$
- If $f(K,S)=(S-K)^+$, we have the variants of call options. In particular, we know that european and american are the same in this case. How do we go about pricing each of the above for some other $f$. E.g. I am interested in $f(K,S)=ln(S),\sqrt{S},S^3$ as some examples.
- How can I replicate each of those? Is Delta-hedging always a choice?
## Answer by Kevin (score 1, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/74893
As I said in the comments, the question is extremely broad: pricing an almost arbitrary payoff function for an arbitrary exercise rule for a general stock price process. There are entire books on these issues but here's a short summary. Ultimately, if you want more concrete answers, you need to narrow down your question.
### European Options
From the martingale property, we can find prices from discounted expected payoffs under the risk-neutral measure: $$V_E=e^{-rT}\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[f(K,S_T)].$$ For example, the price of a call option is $C_E=e^{-rT}\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[\max\{S_T-K,0\}]$. If we make assumptions about the distribution of $S_T$, we can calculate that expectation (or approximate it by simulations in the worst case). Assuming a log-normal distribution, we recover the formulas from Black-Scholes (1973) for vanilla options.
- If we focus on call options for $f$, we can adjust the general formula above using numeraire changes and decompose the option value into exercise probability (value of digital options). This will hold for all stock price models.
- If we focus on a stock price model (say geometric Brownian motion), we can calculate the Greeks and find that $f$ determines the sign of delta, vega and gamma (monotonic $f$ means positive delta, convex $f$ means positive vega and gamma).
There is a second way to price European options: The spanning formula from Carr and Madan (1998): $$V_E=e^{-rT}\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[f(S_T)]=e^{-rT}f(F_0) + \int_0^{F_0} f''(K) \text{Put}(K) \ \text{d} K + \int_{F_0}^{\infty} f''(K) \text{Call}(K) \ \text{d} K.$$ Given a complete set of prices for vanilla options, you can now price pretty much every integrable payoff function. A famous example would be the log-contract from Neuberger (1994): Suppose $\text{d}F_t=\sqrt{v_t}F_t\text{d}W_t$. Then, by Ito's Lemma, \begin{align} \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\left[\ln\left(\frac{F_T}{F_0}\right)\right]=-\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\left[\int_0^Tv_t\text{d}t\right]=-\left(\int_0^{F_0}\frac{\text{Put}(K)}{K^2}\text{d}K+\int_{F_0}^\infty \frac{\text{Call}(K)}{K^2}\text{d}K\right). \end{align} You get similar formulas if your payoff is $\sqrt{S}$ or $S^3$. Crucially, these formulas are mostly model-independent.
### American Options
American options are much harder because they allow you to exercise at any time. Their value is given by $$V_A=\sup_\tau\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[e^{-r\tau}f(K,S_\tau)],$$ where you additionally maximise over all possible exercise policies (stopping times) $\tau$. There exist a host of numerical procedures to deal with this problem. Two elegant approaches (depending on your payoff function) include maturity randomisation and early exercise decomposition. For example, an American call option is worth
$$C_A = C_E + qS_0\int_0^Te^{-qt}\mathbb{Q}^1[\{S_t\geq B_t\}]\text{d}t - rK\int_0^T e^{-rt}\mathbb{Q}[\{S_t\geq B_t\}]\text{d}t,$$ where $B_t$ is the optimal exercise boundary (which you can find recusrively). We can caluclate Greeks of this value function.
### Perpetual Options
I find perpetual options to be among the most interesting objects in finance. They are an entirely different beast because there's no time dependence (elliptic rather than parabolic in PDE language). There are several approaches to pricing perpetual options. You can take American options and consider the limit $T\to\infty$ or derive the corresponding PDE problem. I think the following is more elegant: An American call is worth $V_A=\sup\limits_\tau \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[e^{-r\tau}f(S_\tau,K)]$. This problem is equivalent to finding the optimal early exercise boundary $B_t$ (``exercise if $S_t>B_t$''). For perpetual options, $B_t\equiv B$ is constant (under a GBM). The option value is thus
$$V_\infty=\max_B \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[e^{-r\tau_B}]f(B,K),$$ where $\tau_B$ is the first time $S$ reaches the threshold $B$. I really like the term $\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[e^{-r\tau_B}]$ which looks like an ``expected discount factor''. Intuitively, the optimal $B^*$ resolves the trade-off between a higher payoff and a higher discount factor. Mathematically, $\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[e^{-r\tau_B}]$ is the Laplace transform of the density function of $\tau_B$. If we assume a stochastic model for $S$, we can either calculate that expectation in closed-form or approximate it via simulations. The case for call/put options and a geometric Brownian motion has a very well-known solution.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.