Pricing Options with Cash or Physical Deferred Delivery
Summary
The document explains how settlement after expiry can affect option valuation, distinguishing cash-deferred from physically deferred delivery under deterministic interest rates. In the cash-settled case, the exercise payoff is determined at expiry and then paid later, so the ordinary expiry-based Black valuation is discounted to the delivery date. The forward and volatility inputs remain associated with expiry.
For physical delivery, the option instead creates an asset purchase at the later delivery date. At expiry, its value corresponds to a forward position, which shifts the effective strike by the discount factor. The resulting formulation uses the delivery-date forward and volatility evaluated at a shifted strike. The text also gives a generalized expression accounting for dividends, storage costs, and convenience yields, and cites a reference for a numerical example. These results rely on the stated deterministic-rate framework; stochastic rates make the treatment more involved, and the document does not work through a concrete numerical example.
Key ideas
- Cash-deferred options are exercised using the expiry-date payoff, with payment discounted to delivery.
- Physical deferred delivery is equivalent at expiry to a forward position with a discounted strike.
- The physical-settlement valuation uses the delivery-date forward and volatility at a shifted strike.
- Dividends and carrying costs affect the relationship between expiry and delivery forwards.
- Stochastic interest rates require a more involved analysis than the deterministic-rate case described.
Tags
Full text
# Handling delayed settlement / delivery in option pricing
# Handling delayed settlement / delivery in option pricing
Can you please shed some light on how settlement/delivery delay impacts option pricing? Assume settlement/delivery happens 2BD after option expiry date and the price is computed using Black Forward model where
$$d_1 = \frac{\ln\left(\frac{F}{K}\right) + \frac{v^2}{2} T}{v \sqrt{T}},$$
and $F$ is the forward’s price, $K$ is the strike price, $v$ is the volatility, and $T$ is the time to expiration.
Should $F$ be computed as of expiry date or delivery date? Also, assume there's a cash dividend during the option's life. Will greatly appreciate if someone can give a worked-out example. I have noticed conflicting information online and in a trading system that my firm uses.
## Answer by river_rat (score 5)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/83984
So the answer depends on a few things, and is remarkably more complicated if you have stochastic rates. But assuming deterministic rates you have two cases - cash deferred and physically deferred settlement.
We need a few things. Let $T_e$ be the expiry time and $T_d > T_e$ be the delivery time. We have an implied vol surface $\sigma(K, T)$ and some lognormal asset $X(t)$. Let $P(t,T)$ be the zero bond ie discount factor and we assume zero dividends, storage costs and convenience yields. The asset forward curve is then given by $F(t,T)=X(t) / P(t,T)$.
Finally we consider a call with strike $K$ which we can price via Black-76 with price $$V(t)=P(t,T) \times Black(F(t,T), K, \sigma(K,T),T) = P(t,T)\times \mathbb{E}(\left(X(T)-K\right)^+|\mathbb{F}_t)$$ for a given expiry $T$ and strike $K$
If we are considering cash deferred delivery then we know that at time $T_d$ we will receive $X(T_e)-K$ as cash. This has value $P(T_e, T_d)\times\left(X(T_e)-K\right)$ at expiry so we exercise the call under the standard assumptions for cash delivery. ie. We are looking at $$V(t)=P(t,T_e)\times\mathbb{E}(P(T_e, T_d)\left(X(T_e)-K\right)^+) = P(t,T_d)\times Black(F(t,T_e), K, \sigma(K,T_e),T_e)$$ So cash deferred delivery is just priced normally but discounted to the future delivery date.
For physically settled deferred delivery we have that we receive 1 unit of asset at time $T_d$ which we pay $K$ for and sell for $X(T_d)$. This has value $X(T_e)-P(T_e,T_d)\times K$ at time $T_e$ as it is the NPV of a forward contract. This implies that our exercise decision is different for deferred physical settlement as we are concerned rather with the fact that the price needs to be higher than some shifted strike value. Once again we see that $$V(t)=P(t,T_e)\times\mathbb{E}((X(T_e)-P(T_e,T_d)\times K)^+)$$ $$= P(t,T_e) Black(F(t,T_e), P(T_d,T_e)\times K, \sigma(P(T_d,T_e)\times K,T_e),T_e)$$ $$=P(t,T_d)Black(F(t,T_d),K,\sigma(P(T_d,T_e)\times K,T_e)$$ So for physical deferred settlement we price with the delivery forward date and with the vol of a shifted strike. For completeness (and as an exercise for the reader) you can show that if you have dividends, storage and convenience yields then your pricing equation ends up being $$V(t) = P(t,T_d) Black(F(t,T_d),K,\sigma(\frac{F(t,T_e)}{F(t,T_d)}\times K,T_e),T_e)$$
## Answer by Enrico Schumann (score 0)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/83978
It is discussed in Haug (2007), section 6.1, including a numeric example. The author adds a discount factor to the payoff (but essentially reuses the standard Black-Scholes-Merton formula). The question is also discussed at Delayed Settlement Option- how will values in Black Scholes change .
```
@BOOK{,
title = {The Complete Guide to Option Pricing Formulas},
publisher = {McGraw-Hill},
year = 2007,
author = {Espen Gaarder Haug},
edition = {2}
}
```Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.