Quanto and Compo Adjustments for Products of Correlated Assets
Summary
The document derives the expectation of the product of two correlated geometric Brownian motion processes, such as a foreign asset price and an exchange rate. It reduces the weighted sum of their Brownian shocks to a single Gaussian shock whose variance includes the correlation term. This makes the product lognormal and shows why its expected value under a given measure depends on the correlation of the processes.
The discussion then distinguishes that calculation from pricing under the domestic risk-neutral measure. Under no-arbitrage and deterministic domestic rates, the domestic-currency asset value discounted by the domestic money-market account is a martingale, so its domestic-measure expectation follows from that condition and does not depend on correlation in the same way. This is identified as a compo adjustment, while quanto pricing involves a measure change. The document does not work out the requested mixed-time expectation, and the conclusions rely on the stated measure, market-completeness, and rate assumptions.
Key ideas
- A weighted sum of correlated Brownian motions can be represented by one Brownian motion with variance adjusted for correlation.
- The product of two geometric Brownian motion processes is lognormal under the stated dynamics.
- The product expectation under the original measure depends on the correlation between the processes.
- Risk-neutral expectations depend on the chosen currency measure and the associated martingale condition.
- The compo conclusion assumes no arbitrage, market completeness, and deterministic rates.
Tags
Full text
# Quanto/Compo adjustments - Product of two geometric brownian motion
# Quanto/Compo adjustments - Product of two geometric brownian motion
Let's say I have two processes $X_t =X_0 \exp((a-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_X^2)t +\sigma_X dW_t^1)$ and $Y_t=Y_0 \exp((b-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_Y^2)t +\sigma_Y dW_t^2)$ and I then multiply them together (like converting a foreign asset into domestic currency). I arrive at
$X_tY_t = X_0Y_0 \exp((a+b-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_X^2-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_Y^2)t +\sigma_X dW_t^1+\sigma_Y dW_t^2)$
If I then assume the $W_t$ have a correlation of $\rho$, how would I obtain the expectation of $X_tY_t$. The thing that is troubling me is because I have 2 Brownian motions and I'm not sure how to compute from there.
Edit: I would like to make this question a little bit more general. What would I do if I wanted to compute $E[X_t Y_s]$, where say $s < t$. So something to do with independent increments would play a factor.
## Answer by Quantuple (score 2, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25788
Just use the fact that $$ \sigma_X W_t^1 + \sigma_Y W_t^2 = \sqrt{ \sigma_X^2 + \sigma_Y^2 + 2\rho\sigma_X\sigma_Y } W_t $$ holds in probability assuming that $W_t^1$ and $W_t^2$ are 2 correlated Brownian motions with $$ d\langle W_t^1, W_t^2 \rangle_t = \rho dt $$ and $W_t$ is a new standard Brownian motion defined over the same probability space.
Simply put, just replace your sum of two correlated Gaussians (LHS above) by a single Gaussian (RHS above) exhibitting the exact same statistical properties (for a Gaussian identical mean/variance is enough). Doing so, you can now use the formulas you are accustomed to.
Applying this shows $$ X_t Y_t = X_0Y_0 \exp((a+b-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_X^2-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_Y^2)t +\sqrt{ \sigma_X^2 + \sigma_Y^2 + 2\rho\sigma_X\sigma_Y } W_t) $$ is lognormally distributed with mean $$ \mu = \ln(X_0Y_0)+(a+b-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_X^2-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_Y^2)t $$ and variance $$ \sigma^2 = (\sigma_X^2 + \sigma_Y^2 + 2\rho\sigma_X\sigma_Y)t $$
hence applying the usual formula for the mean of a lognormally distributed variable $$ E[X_t Y_t] = e^{\mu + \sigma^2/2} $$ is a function of $\rho$.
[Edit]
I think you are completely mixing up two different problems (here two different probability measures).
I understand from your comment that you define the dynamics of the FOR/DOM instantaneous exchange rate $X_t$ (i.e. $X_t = x$ meaning that, at time $t$, 1 unit of foreign currency = x units of domestic currency) under the foreign risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}^f$ (or rather the probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{Q}^f)$ along with the price process of an equity underlying denominated in the foreign currency.
In that case, under the domestic risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}^d$ (or rather the probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{Q}^d)$), one should have, by absence of arbitrage opportunities and assuming market completeness: $$ \frac{Y_t X_t}{B_t^d} \text{ is a } \mathbb{Q}^d \text{- martingale} $$
with $B^d_t$ representing the time-$t$ value of a risk-free money market account in the domestic economy in which 1 unit of currency has been invested at $t=0$. Using the martingale property it then entails that: $$ \frac{Y_0 X_0}{B_0^d} = Y_0 X_0 = E^{\mathbb{Q}^d} \left[ \frac{Y_t X_t}{B_t^d} \vert \mathcal{F}_0 \right] $$ and further assuming deterministic rates: $$ E ^{\mathbb{Q}^d} \left[ X_t Y_t \vert \mathcal{F}_0 \right] = e^{-r_d t} X_0 Y_0 $$ which is independent of $\rho$.
This is known as a compo adjustment in deriatives lingo.
That being said, under the measure $\mathbb{Q}^f$ where you have originally defined $X_t$ and $Y_t$, the expectation $E^{\mathbb{Q}^f} [ Y_t X_t ]$ does dependent on $\rho$ as hinted above.
More info on the quanto/compo change of measure technique hereShown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.