Ranking Concentrated Liquidity Pools by Fee Yield and Net Value
Summary
This live dashboard scans concentrated liquidity pools across several chains and decentralized exchanges, then ranks them by estimated annualized fees. It lists each pool’s pair, fee tier, total value locked, 24-hour trading volume and trade count, turnover, price movement, estimated impermanent loss, and a daily net-value measure. The displayed figures let a researcher compare pools with different activity and fee profiles, including major pairs and smaller tokens.
The logs show that the leading pool and its estimated fee yield can change over time, while the pool count also varies. The dashboard labels annualized fees as pool-wide averages and explicitly cautions that they do not equal the return on an individual position. A row also flags suspected wash trading, illustrating that reported volume may need scrutiny. The page provides snapshot metrics and monitoring history, but no calculation methodology, validated realized returns, position-specific outcomes, or systematic test of whether the rankings predict future LP performance.
Key ideas
- The scanner ranks concentrated liquidity pools using estimated annualized fee rates.
- It presents liquidity, trading activity, turnover, price change, impermanent loss, and daily net-value metrics.
- Repeated log entries show that reported pool rankings and fee estimates change over time.
- Pool-wide fee estimates may not reflect the return earned by an individual liquidity position.
- A suspected wash-trading flag highlights the need to assess data quality before relying on volume.
Tags
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.