Skip to content
All library documents

Reading BTC and ETH Derivatives Signals Around an ETF Catalyst

Article Deribit Insights

Summary

This weekly report interprets BTC and ETH futures, perpetual swap funding, and options volatility surfaces in the lead-up to an anticipated ETF announcement. It describes a kink in the at-the-money volatility term structure moving toward shorter expiries, while volatility beyond late January is said to remain around the mid-50s. BTC short-dated skew recovered alongside increased demand for out-of-the-money calls; ETH showed weaker one-week upside volatility and a more neutral one-month smile. Futures-implied yields rose, and funding rates for both perpetual swaps indicated strong demand for leveraged long exposure.

The report compares the two assets across annualized futures yields, 25-delta risk reversals, volatility smiles, and SABR-calibrated surfaces. It says BTC one-month volatility rose as the expected announcement approached, while ETH’s one-week and one-month volatility diverged. Surface z-scores are calculated against the prior 30 days of hourly implied-volatility observations at matching delta and tenor. These are snapshot interpretations, not a tested forecast or trading rule; the supplied text omits the underlying charts and tables, and the signals are specific to the report’s market window.

Key ideas

  • The report links shorter-tenor BTC volatility changes to the approaching ETF announcement date.
  • BTC short-tenor skew recovered as demand for out-of-the-money calls increased.
  • ETH showed a different pattern, with falling one-week upside volatility and a more neutral one-month smile.
  • Perpetual funding rates indicated strong demand for leveraged long positions in both assets.
  • The surface z-scores compare implied volatility with the preceding 30 days of hourly observations at matching delta and tenor.

Tags

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.