Rebasing Price Series to Compare Instruments on One Chart
Summary
This exchange addresses how to compare several instruments with different nominal price levels on a shared chart. The questioner finds that raw prices and log prices retain scale differences, while single-period returns are too small to make the paths easy to compare visually.
The suggested solution is to rebase each price series to a common starting value, effectively converting cumulative returns into an index such as a base of 100. This makes relative performance paths directly comparable; plotting the rebased series or its logarithm are both suggested. The method assumes the instruments cover the same start and end dates so they can share a common base period. It is a visualization technique for comparing indexed performance, not a normalization that makes volatility or risk equivalent across instruments.
Key ideas
- Rebase each instrument’s price series to a common starting value for visual comparison.
- A shared index base expresses subsequent prices as cumulative relative performance.
- Rebased series can be plotted directly or on a logarithmic scale.
- The suggested comparison assumes the instruments share aligned start and end dates.
- Rebasing does not equalize volatility or risk across instruments.
Tags
Full text
# Different range price data on one chart # Different range price data on one chart I'd like to evaluate 3-4 instruments on one price chart. For example: I try to use: - Ln(close) - too different values, to put them on one chart, same results with Close(0)-Average(10) - returns Close(0)-Close(-1), (Close(0)-Close(-1))*100/Close(-1) - deviations are too small for evaluating Is there any way to normalize different price data on one Y axis to get look like this ## Answer by Viquar (score 2) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10854 have you tried to rebase the timeseries? if the start and end dates are same, you could basically have 100*(1+returns). easy to then plot either directly or log of the new time series.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.