Regression Challenges in Linear Market-Impact Models
Summary
The document examines parameter estimation in a linear supply-curve model of liquidity risk. In the described model, the observed price depends on an unaffected price and traded volume, and the impact coefficient is estimated by regressing log price changes on changes in volume alongside drift and diffusion terms. The question raises practical choices about signed buy and sell volume, estimating the drift contribution, and using intraday observations across trading days.
The response cautions that the model’s empirical use is difficult without suitable data and because price noise and the volume-impact contribution may operate at very different scales. It suggests representing order flow as a point process, such as a Hawkes process, and emphasizes the value of trade data that identifies side and metaorder membership. It also points to work on self-financing equations in high-frequency markets. The answer does not prescribe a specific regression specification or resolve the data-frequency and overnight-jump questions, so the guidance is conceptual rather than a tested estimation recipe.
Key ideas
- The model estimates a linear price-impact coefficient from log price changes and changes in traded volume.
- The interpretation of volume changes depends on whether trades are signed by buy and sell direction.
- Drift and diffusion noise can complicate identification of the volume-impact contribution.
- Order flow may be better represented as a point process, with Hawkes processes offered as one example.
- Trade-side and metaorder data can help study market impact, but the response does not provide a complete regression procedure.
Tags
Full text
# Regression in liquidity risk model of Jarrow/Protter
# Regression in liquidity risk model of Jarrow/Protter
In the paper "Liquidity Risk and Risk Measure Computation" authors describe a linear supply curve model for liquidity risks in presence of market impact, i.e. impact-affected asset price $S(t,x)$ is proportional to unaffceted price $S(t,0)$ and to traded volume $x$ with some coefficient $\alpha$.
Under the diffusion (with constant drift $\mu$ and volatility $\sigma$) assumption for unaffected price process, the model parameter $\alpha$ is estimated through the regression on returns (see (9)):
$$\log\left(\frac{S(t_2,x_{t_2})}{S(t_1,x_{t_1})}\right) \simeq \int_{t_1}^{t_2}(\mu-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)dt + \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\sigma dW_t + \alpha(x_{t_2}-x_{t_1})$$
There is a couple of basic questions that comes up regarding this regression:
- Should one use the signed values for the buy/sell volumes $x_{t_1}$ and $x_{t_2}$? In the section 2 of the article this is mentioned, however the regression on $x_{t_2}-x_{t_1}$ seems to be complicated in some cases. For example, if there are only buy trades of the same size or when one has only external trades data with no indication of buy/sell available.
- How should we treat $\int_{t_1}^{t_2}(\mu-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)dt$ term? Should we estimate it in the same regression or estimate it separately using unaffected price time series $S(t,0)$?
- Is it fine to use intraday data throughout a certain period for this regression (e.g. shouldn't one try to account for price jumps between trading days)?
## Answer by lehalle (score 2)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/17715
I really like Philip P's work, but frankly I do not believe this paper is his best one. It is understandable you do not catch how to use it: there is no dataset in the paper, and the orders of magnitude of $\sigma dW$ and $\delta_t x$ are so different.
My suggestions:
- some components are missing, $x$ should be a point process, for instance an Hawkes process. Have a look at Market impacts and the life cycle of investors orders (Bacry, Iuga, Lasnier, L) if you want to see how to capture market impact on an informed database (i.e. you have 100% of the information on trades: their side, the metaorder they belong to, etc).
- There is a recent paper by Réné Carmona (and Webster): The Self-Financing Equation in High Frequency Markets. It is shown how to use raw market data to write properly the self financing equation needed in math finance. It contains Jarrow and Protter viewpoint.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.