Skip to content
All library documents

Replicating the Integrated Proportional Price Change with Stock

Article Quant Q&A · Author: NN2

Summary

The document considers a claim whose payoff is the time integral of an asset’s proportional price change. Its main replication argument is direct: hold one unit of the underlying’s inverse price, or equivalently one dollar of stock exposure, so the portfolio’s value changes by the asset’s proportional price change over time. This argument does not require deterministic interest rates or volatility.

The discussion also presents a bond-based derivation under a forward measure. It defines the accumulated payoff process and expresses its discounted value using a zero-coupon bond, leading to a proposed hedge involving both the stock and the bond. The source is a short exchange of answers rather than a fully reconciled derivation: the direct strategy is simple, while the bond-based expression is tentative and its treatment of second-order terms is not developed. The document assumes the needed assets and bond prices are tradable.

Key ideas

  • The target payoff accumulates proportional price changes over the life of the claim.
  • Holding one unit of stock exposure measured as one over the current price produces the required incremental payoff.
  • The direct replication argument works with stochastic rates and volatility under the stated trading assumptions.
  • A zero-coupon bond can be used to frame a discounted-value argument under the forward measure.
  • The bond-based hedge is presented tentatively and is not fully derived in the source.

Tags

Full text
# Strategy of replicating a portfolio with payoff $\int_0^T \frac{dS_t}{S_t}$


# Strategy of replicating a portfolio with payoff $\int_0^T \frac{dS_t}{S_t}$












Given the asset price $S_t$ which is defined as follows $$\frac{dS_t}{S_t}= r_tdt+\sigma_tdW_t$$ where $r_t$ is not necessarily deterministic.

What is the strategy of replication of the portfolio with the payoff $\int_0^T \frac{dS_t}{S_t}$ ?

My attempt:

In fact, I can solve this problem only for the special case where $r_t$ is deterministic. For simplicity's sake, I provide the solution for an easier case where $r_t =r$ constant.

Let's $V_t$ the replicating porfolio of $\int_0^T \frac{dS_t}{S_t}$, we have \begin{align} V_t &=e^{-r(T-t)}E^{\Bbb Q}[\int_0^T \frac{dS_u}{S_u}|\mathcal{F}_t] \\ &=e^{-r(T-t)}\int_0^t \frac{dS_u}{S_u}+e^{-r(T-t)}E^{\Bbb Q}[\int_t^T (rdu+\sigma_udW_u)|\mathcal{F}_t] \tag{1}\\ &=e^{-r(T-t)}(\int_0^t \frac{dS_u}{S_u}+r(T-t)) \tag{2}\\ \end{align}

From (2), by applying the Ito's lemma, we obtain easily that \begin{align} dV_t &= re^{-r(T-t)}(\int_0^t \frac{dS_u}{S_u}+r(T-t))dt +e^{-r(T-t)}(\frac{dS_t}{S_t}-rdt) \\ &= r(V_t-e^{-r(T-t)})dt+e^{-r(T-t)} \frac{dS_t}{S_t} \tag{3}\\ \end{align}

From (3), we obseve that we can replicate $V_t$ (which is equal to $\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{S_t}S_t+ \frac{V_t-e^{-r(T-t)}}{B_t}B_t$) by investing $e^{-r(T-t)}$ in the asset $S_t$ at time $t$ and the rest of the portfolio $(V_t-e^{-r(T-t)})$ in cash.

Problem:

For the general case where $r_t$ is stochastic, I don't know how to deduce (2) from (1), or (3) from (2).

I guess the strategy in the general case must be investing $P(t,T)$ in the asset $S_t$ ($P(t,T)$ is the zero-coupon bond price between $t$ and $T$) and the rest of the portfolio in cash. But I don't know how to prove that.

The zero-coupon bond $P(t,T)$ is specified by

$$\frac{dP(t,T)}{P(t,T)} = r_tdt + \gamma_t dB_t$$

For simplicity's sake, let's suppose the correlation between $B_t$ and $W_t$ be zero ($\left<dB_t,dW_t\right> = 0$)

## Answer by siou0107 (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/61558

It is actually fairly simple: just hold $\frac{1}{S_t}$ units of the stock at all time! Then, no matter if rates or volatilities are stochastic, the change in value of your portfolio is $\frac{dS_t}{S_t}$ at all time and the terminal value of your portfolio is therefore $$ \int_0^T{\frac{\mathrm{d}S_t}{S_t}} $$

## Answer by user34971 (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/61580

So it is sufficient to assume the existence of zero coupon bonds. We do not have to specify anything else.

Define first

$$ X_t = \int_0^t \frac{dS_u}{S_u} $$

Then $$ dX_t = \frac{dS_t}{S_t} $$

Note that $$ X_T = \frac{X_T}{P_T} = \int_0^T d \left( \frac{X_t}{P_t} \right) $$ since $P_T = 1$ and $X_0 = 0$.

Under the $T$-forward measure $X_t/P_t$ is a martingale, which again shows the current price of the claim is $0$.

We are mainly interested in the expression in the integrand: $$ d \left( \frac{X_t}{P_t} \right) = \frac{1}{P_t} dX_t - \frac{X_t}{P_t^2} dP_t + O(dt) $$ We are not interested in the Ito terms as they add up to zero (pricing PDE).

So the replication should be $$ \frac{1}{P_t S_t} dS_t - \frac{1}{P_t^2} \left( \int_0^t \frac{dS_u}{S_u} \right) dP_t $$

I think this is the way to do this.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.