Risk-Free Asset Holdings in a Black–Scholes Call Hedge
Summary
The document asks how a call writer’s risk-free asset position changes over time in a Black–Scholes delta hedge. It states the stock position as the call’s delta, given as the cumulative normal distribution evaluated at d1, and proposes an initial risk-free holding equal to the option premium minus the value of the stock hedge. The question is how to determine the corresponding holding at a later time.
The document supplies no answer or derivation, so it does not establish a rebalancing rule. In the standard frictionless Black–Scholes replication argument, the cash or bond position is inferred from the option value less delta times the stock price at the current time; the position must be updated as the option value, delta, and underlying price change. This relies on model assumptions, including continuous trading and the specified risk-free rate, and the source itself does not discuss those assumptions or practical hedging costs.
Key ideas
- A call writer’s delta hedge holds the underlying in an amount equal to the option delta.
- The initial risk-free asset position is posed as option value minus the value of the stock position.
- The question concerns how that risk-free holding is recalculated as time and market prices change.
- The document provides no worked derivation or answer to its question.
- Practical replication depends on model assumptions and rebalancing conditions.
Tags
Full text
# Quantity of risk-free asset in Black Scholes model
# Quantity of risk-free asset in Black Scholes model
When the seller of a Call option hedges themselves, we know that they should buy $\Delta(t) = \mathcal{N}(d_1(t))$ amounts of the risky asset at time $t$.
But what about the riskless asset? My understanding is that they should buy $V(0) - \Delta(0)S_0$ at time $t = 0$ where $V(0)$ is the price of the option (ie the premium given by the buyer). What should they buy at time $t$?Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.