Scaling Yield Curve Shocks Across Different Interest Rate Levels

# Stress testing fixed income Yield curve with Nelson Siegel


# Stress testing fixed income Yield curve with Nelson Siegel












I am attempting to stress test the Zero coupon Yield curve using The Nelson Siegel model as described in the following papers :

- Generating Yield Curve Stress-Scenarios

- Representative Yield Curve Shocksand Stress Testing

Since i am studying a low rate environment,i noticed that the methods used to determine the shocks does not take into consideration the current level of the rates (because i think the shocks applied to low rate environment should differ from high rate environment )

How can i include the rates level when determining the Yield curve shocks ?

## Answer by Dimitri Vulis (score 0, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/47227

More generally (not just in NS context), suppose that some rate is $R_{now}$ and that you want to apply a shock comparable to the rate changing from $R_{old}$ to $R_{new}$.

The most naive approach is to treat interest rates as you would equity or commodity prices. Suppose $R_{old}=1\%$, and $R_{new}=R_{now}=2\%$ - the rate has gone up $1\%$ or "doubled". Applying the same shock, the rate becomes $R_{now}*R_{new}/R_{old}=4\%$. It needs to up up $2\%$ to "double" again. No, this is like doubling the temperature in Fahrenheit - not good.

A less naive approach is $R_{now}+R_{new}-R_{old}=2\%$. It went up another $1\%$. This works for this example, but suppose $R_{old}=13\%$, $R_{new}=10\%$, $R_{now}=1\%$. You want to replicate the shock when it went down $3\%$. Would it go from $1\%$ to $-2\%$? Negative rates are OK, but you don't want rates $\le-1$.

To make the shocks comparable across different levels, you'd bump to something like $\exp(\ln(1+R_{now})*\ln(1+R_{new})/\ln(1+R_{old}))-1$...

## Answer by AK88 (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/47226

Have a look at Basel document. The section 98.56 and on describe derivation of the interest rate shocks. 16 years may be too long depending on your portfolio, but I think you can shorten the period and start from there.

Caveat: I did not try it myself yet, but will revisit this topic soon and might be able to share my findings. I asked a question related to the document a while ago, but did not receive any answers.

UPDATE

Alright, I did finish some quick and dirty calculations on the comment mentioned above.

I took the US Treasury Yield Curve as of August 30, 2019 and proceeded with Basel proposed method. There are some interesting outputs:

- Since the current yield curve is flat(-ish), for Basel's Flattener I actually got inverted yield curve;

- Given the current yield environment, Basel's Steepener also looks reasonable;

- I now wonder if the "no arbitrage" case is applicable for these scenarios or not. Any input/comment would be appreciated.