Scenario Analysis for a Single-Asset Price Shock
Summary
The document asks how to apply a scenario in which the stock portion of a portfolio falls while the bond and commodity positions are left unchanged. It illustrates a direct repricing approach: apply the assumed percentage loss to the stock holding, retain the other stated values, and add the resulting positions to obtain a new portfolio value. It then asks whether the known correlations among assets should also affect the scenario.
No answer or supporting analysis is included, so the document does not establish a standard practice or resolve how correlation should be used. The example is a one-factor shock with no specified changes to bonds or commodities. Correlation describes how returns have tended to move together; it does not by itself determine their returns under a particular stress. A scenario analyst would need to state whether the other asset moves are held fixed, specified separately, or modeled conditionally. The example is therefore useful as a prompt about assumptions, but not as a complete portfolio stress-testing method.
Key ideas
- A direct scenario can revalue the shocked holding while keeping other asset values fixed.
- The example asks whether correlations should influence the treatment of unshocked assets.
- Correlation alone does not specify the returns of other assets in a particular stress scenario.
- Scenario results depend on clearly stated assumptions about which asset prices change.
Tags
Full text
# Scenario Analysis - Real life application # Scenario Analysis - Real life application Given a portfolio consists of Stock = usd 40, Bond = usd 40, commodity =usd 20. Also given the correlation between these assets. Scenario 1 : stock down by 30% When performing scenario analysis, do we usually take correlation into account? or just do it this way: Stock= 40*0.7=28 Bond= 40 Commodity= 20 Thus portfolio value becomes usd 88. Is this the correct way to do scenario analysis?
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.