Semimartingale Differentials, Itô’s Formula, and Feynman–Kac Limits
Summary
The document presents a canonical semimartingale decomposition into a bounded variation component, a continuous martingale part, a compensated jump integral, and a residual jump term. It clarifies that the process differential is the object used as an integrator in stochastic integration; a separate question is how to express the differential of a function of the process, which is addressed by the general Itô formula.
It also explains why a conventional Feynman–Kac or Kolmogorov equation is not generally useful for an arbitrary semimartingale: these equations rely on Markov structure and an appropriate generator. Diffusions and jump-diffusions can lead to differential or integro-differential equations under suitable assumptions, while a general process may retain history dependence. Enlarging the state to include the entire history is mentioned as a formal possibility, though not a practical solution. The document poses the question but does not derive the explicit differential or characteristic-function equation.
Key ideas
- A semimartingale can be decomposed into finite variation, continuous martingale, and jump components.
- The differential of the process serves as an integrator in stochastic integration.
- Itô’s formula describes the dynamics of a function of a semimartingale.
- Feynman–Kac equations typically depend on Markov structure and a suitable generator.
- A general semimartingale may not yield a useful state-based PDE without additional assumptions.
Tags
Full text
# What is the stochastic differential of a general semimartingale?
# What is the stochastic differential of a general semimartingale?
By using the canonical representation of a semimartingale in Eberlein, Glau and Papapantoleon's "Analysis of Fourier Transform Valuation Formulas and Applications", on page 3:
$$H = B + H^c + h(x) \ast (\mu − \nu) + (x − h(x)) \ast μ$$
where:
- $h = h(x)$ is a truncation function,
- $B = (B_t)_{0 \leq t \leq T}$ is a predictable process of bounded variation,
- $H^c = (H^c_t )_{0 \leq t \leq T}$ is the continuous martingale part of $H$ with predictable quadratic characteristic,
- $\langle H^c \rangle = C$, and $\nu$ is the predictable compensator of the random measure of jumps $μ$ of $H$.
Here, $W \ast μ$ denotes the integral process of $W$ with respect to $μ$, and $W \ast (μ − \nu)$ denotes the stochastic integral of $W$ with respect to the compensated random measure $μ − \nu$.
I want to find an SDE for $H_t$.
What is the stochastic differential for $H_t$, $dH_t$?
Is it possible to use a Feynman-Kac type formula to get the PDE for the characteristic function of $H_t$?
## Answer by Ulysses (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/15354
If I am not mistaken, the Feynman-Kac formula is related to the Kolmogorov's backward equation, so I would expect it to be available only for Markov processes. Diffusions are usually of Markovian type, in contrast to general Ito processes or more to say, general semimartinagales. Intuitively, the PDE/PIDE/... will describe the dynamics of distribution/expectation in time based on the current spatial structure: $$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} = Af \tag{1} $$ where $A$ is a suitable linear operator (differential in case of diffusion, integro-differential for jump-diffusions). The dependence of the type $(1)$ certainly hints upon the Markovian structure, so I would not expect useful F-K formulas to be available for general semiartingales. I say useful, since you can always include the whole history of the process as a state to try to express this as a Markov process, but over such an enlarged state space, I don't think F-K would be of any use even though it would be available.
Regarding the stochastic differential, as with usual differential you are trying to decompose one function dynamics w.r.t. another. That is, $dH_t$ is a stochastic differential on its own, and it can be used as an integrator per theory of semimartingale stochastic integration. Another question is whether $df(H_t)$ can be expressed in terms of $H_t$. This is indeed true, see the general Ito formula in Theorem 2.7.1 here.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.