Separating Interest Rate and Credit Spread Sensitivities in FRTB
Summary
The document distinguishes the FRTB standard approach’s sensitivities to risk-free interest rates and credit spreads. PV01 measures an instrument’s value change under a one-basis-point rate shock at a specified tenor while holding the credit spread fixed; CS01 applies a spread shock while holding the rate fixed. The question arises because bond cash flows are discounted using rates that combine risk-free rates and credit spreads, making the two shocks appear numerically interchangeable when viewed only through the combined spot rate.
The response proposes deriving a credit default swap spread from the bond price, risk-free rate, and an assumed loss given default, then perturbing that spread and repricing the bond to estimate CS01. For PV01, it suggests holding CDS spreads constant and recalculating default probability after a rate perturbation. The answer explicitly leaves unresolved whether this procedure is permitted under FRTB. Its proposal is therefore illustrative rather than authoritative regulatory guidance, and assumes a credit-risk modeling framework that the discussion does not specify fully.
Key ideas
- PV01 shocks the risk-free rate while holding credit spread constant.
- CS01 shocks credit spread while holding the risk-free rate constant.
- A combined discount rate can obscure the distinct risk factors used for sensitivity calculations.
- The suggested CDS-based repricing approach is tentative, and its FRTB acceptability is unresolved.
Tags
Full text
# FRTB Delta CSR vs Delta GIRR
# FRTB Delta CSR vs Delta GIRR
In Basel III, FRTB SA includes different market risk capital requirements for interest rate (GIRR §21.19) and credit spread risk (CSR §21.20) exposures. These are different risks, as credit spreads and risk-free rates can change independently.
As to the first approximation for those risks - delta - sensitivities are PV01 and CS01. PV01 is computed as the change in the instrument's value given by 1bp change in the risk-free rate for one of the prescribed tenors, while keeping the credit spread constant:
$ s_{k,r_{t}} = \frac{V_{i}(r_{t} + 0.0001, cs_{t}) - V_{i}(r_{t} , cs_{t})}{0.0001} $
In the same fashion, CS01 results from 1bp change in credit spread for a specific tenor, keeping constant the risk-free rate.
$ s_{k,cs_{t}} = \frac{V_{i}(r_{t}, cs_{t} + 0.0001) - V_{i}(r_{t} , cs_{t})}{0.0001} $
There's a discussion about credit spreads on this book, where CS01 is computed by changing z-spreads. Z-spread $\textbf{z}$ is obtained from the quoted price of a bond and the risk-free rate. The bond's cash flows are discounted by spot rates which consists of the sum of the risk-free rate and the credit spreads for each tenor:
$P_{mkt} = ce^{-(r_{i}+\textbf{z}_{i})}+ e^{-(r_{t}+\textbf{z}_{t})}$
If the spot rate for tenor $i$ equals $r_{i}+{z}_{i}$, how are PV01 and CS01 for tenor $i$ supposed to be numerically different sensitivies, as it doesn't matter if one's giving a shock to $r_{i}$ or ${z}_{i}$?
## Answer by Dimitri Vulis (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/75793
I don't know whether the following is allowed for FRTB. I would appreciate if someone who knows whether this was explicitly allowed or disallowed tells everyone.
Make some assumption about the loss given default. Calculate the CDS spread from the bond price, the risk-free interest rate, and the LGD. Perturb the CDS spread, and back out the new bond price. Scale the bond price change to 100% shock to get CS01.
If you take this approach for a fixed-coupon bond, then perturbing the CDS spread is close to, but not exactly the same as perturning the risk-free rate or the yield.
Also, not very material, when calculating the PV01, you may ptefer to keep the CDS spreads constant and recalculate the PD from the perturbed interest rate, and reprice the bond from the perturbed interest rate and the recalculated PD.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.