Skip to content
All library documents

Small-Time Approximations for Exponential Terms in Option Valuation

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Hebe

Summary

The document explains why, for small time intervals, an exponential expression containing both a square-root-time term and a time-linear term may be approximated first by dropping the linear term, then by using a first-order Taylor expansion. Writing the coefficients as a and b, the two exponent terms are a√t and bt. Both approach zero, but the linear term shrinks faster as t becomes small, so it can be negligible relative to the square-root term under suitable coefficient values.

The answers justify the steps using the exponential product rule and the approximation exp(x) ≈ 1 + x near zero. Taylor expansions show that dropping bt introduces an error of order t, and replacing the remaining exponential by its linear approximation also leaves an error of order t. These are conditional approximations, not universal identities: their quality depends on the coefficients and the time range. The document offers no numerical assessment for a particular option or parameter set.

Key ideas

  • The terms proportional to √t and t both vanish as time approaches zero, but at different rates.
  • A time-linear exponent term may be ignored when it is small relative to the square-root-time term.
  • The first-order Taylor approximation of an exponential is valid when its argument is close to zero.
  • The stated approximations have errors that scale linearly with t to leading order.
  • Acceptability depends on the coefficients and the time interval being considered.

Tags

Full text
# Question on an approximation in pricing formula


# Question on an approximation in pricing formula












I am reading the book An Introduction to Financial Option Valuation. The following on page 58 makes me confused:

> For the formula: $\exp \left\{ -1.96\sigma \sqrt{t}+(\mu-0.5 \sigma^2)t \right\}$, if $t$ is small, then it is approximately equal to $\exp \left (-1.96 \sigma \sqrt{t} \right )$. Moreover, the second formula approximagely equals $1 - 1.96 \sigma \sqrt{t}$.

I don't understand how can we get the second and the third expression. If $t$ is very small, then $\sqrt{t}$ should be infinitesimal. Then, why has $(\mu-0.5 \sigma^2)t$ disappeared in the second formula, but not $-1.96 \sigma \sqrt{t}$?

## Answer by QuantIbex (score 5, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/8528

To simplify notations, let $a:= -1.96\sigma$ and $b := \mu - 0.5\sigma^2$. The development in the book could be justified if both $a\sqrt{t}$ and $bt$ are small (close to zero), and if we have that $|a\sqrt{t}| > |bt|$.

Recall that

- $\exp (x+y)= \exp(x)\exp(y)$,

- $\exp(x)\approx 1 + x,\quad \text{if } x\approx 0$.

Then, using these properties we have \begin{align} \exp (a\sqrt{t} + bt) &= \exp (a\sqrt{t}) \exp (bt)\\ &\approx \exp (a\sqrt{t}) (1 + bt) \\ &\approx \exp (a\sqrt{t}),\tag{1} \\ &\approx 1 + a\sqrt{t}, \end{align} where the approximation in (1) follows from the fact that $bt$ is (very) close to zero.

The fact that $bt$ dissapeared but not $a\sqrt{t}$ comes from the fact that they probably assume that $|a\sqrt{t}| > |bt|$. This assumption should be explicitly stated or obvious from the context (given the typical values for $\sigma$ and $\mu$).

## Answer by jens_bo (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/8539

I wanted to add this side note to Quantelbex' answer:

Both factors in $\exp(a\sqrt t)\exp(b t)$ go to one as $t$ goes to zero, but for small $t$, the $\exp(b t)$ term approaches one faster. For $t=\frac {a^2}{b^2}$ both factors are the same, if $t$ is smaller than $\frac {a^2}{b^2}$, we have $\exp(a\sqrt t) > \exp(bt)$. Thus the approximation that $\exp(a \sqrt t + b t) \approx \exp(a \sqrt t)$ for small $t$.

Using the Taylor expansion for the exponential we can calculate the error that is made with this approximation:\begin{align}\exp(a \sqrt t + b t) - \exp(a\sqrt t) &= 1+a\sqrt t +b t + \frac 12 a^2 t +\mathcal O(t^{3/2}) - (1+a\sqrt t + \frac 12 a^2 t + \mathcal O(t^{3/2}))\\ &= b t + \mathcal O(t^{3/2})\end{align}

The second approximation is just the Taylor expansion of the first one and the error is given by: \begin{align}\exp(a \sqrt t + b t) - 1-a\sqrt t &= 1+a\sqrt t +b t + \frac 12 a^2 t +\mathcal O(t^{3/2}) - 1-a\sqrt t\\ &= (b + \frac 12 a^2) t + \mathcal O(t^{3/2})\end{align}

So in both cases the error vanishes linear in $t$, but in order to understand the error one makes, one needs to know $a$ and $b$ to know if the approximations are acceptable for the values of $t$ you consider.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.